4.8 sec in total
857 ms
3.5 sec
412 ms
Welcome to paul-graham-online.com homepage info - get ready to check Paulgraham Online best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about paul-graham-online.com
Increase web traffic to your blog or website with Paul Graham's Top Traffic Tips and recommended traffic systems for 2013 and beyond.
Visit paul-graham-online.comWe analyzed Paul-graham-online.com page load time and found that the first response time was 857 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
paul-graham-online.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.035
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
42/100
10%
857 ms
170 ms
251 ms
247 ms
252 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Paul-graham-online.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to App.getresponse.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Us-as.gr-cdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Paul-graham-online.com.
Page size can be reduced by 407.9 kB (26%)
1.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Paul-graham-online.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 291.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Paulgraham Online needs image optimization as it can save up to 291.9 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 42.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 42.8 kB or 32% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paul-graham-online.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (55%)
66
30
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paulgraham Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.paul-graham-online.com
857 ms
style.css
170 ms
frontend.popup.css
251 ms
animate.min.css
247 ms
style.min.css
252 ms
adsense-widget.min.css
251 ms
admin-bar.css
268 ms
social_widget.css
356 ms
wp-image-borders.css
323 ms
960.css
375 ms
jquery.min.js
462 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
416 ms
frontend.layered_popup.js
380 ms
common.min.js
502 ms
core.min.js
543 ms
frontend.popup.js
536 ms
4a1678be0c8348d6c3021b6cfbb00447.css
500 ms
css
68 ms
view_webform_v2.js
187 ms
gctwidget.css
589 ms
hoverintent.min.js
693 ms
superfish.min.js
712 ms
supersubs.min.js
714 ms
drop-downs.js
714 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
588 ms
06b53f4099241083b57135f03ae18fa3.js
895 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
621 ms
analytics.js
100 ms
binding_light.png
370 ms
cropped-header2021.png
721 ms
slider42016-2021.png
723 ms
Blog-Banner-1.jpg
654 ms
slider-clickmagick.png
752 ms
slider5-new.jpg
779 ms
Float.png
655 ms
Top-SEO-Tips-For-2013-300x225.jpg
778 ms
Signature.png
777 ms
facebook.png
823 ms
googleplus.png
857 ms
twitter.png
955 ms
linkedin.png
927 ms
youtube.png
926 ms
rss.png
926 ms
square-top-dark.png
896 ms
square-top-dark.png
1026 ms
collect
97 ms
zoom.png
991 ms
352 ms
gr_wf_v2.css
78 ms
38e95a97-19b5-45b4-aa11-d1d568ee3df4.png
417 ms
gtm.js
54 ms
arrow-right.png
876 ms
gtm.js
200 ms
css
143 ms
21-Traffic-Tactics-660-2021-small.png
735 ms
background-navywavy.png
737 ms
webforms_show_styles.9476b9eb2898975c0303.css
192 ms
manifest.35779c62dedb17e0486d.js
195 ms
webforms_entry.chunk.88825abbaf24f26299d7.js
212 ms
show_webform_shared.chunk.e51c6b112972dd577bf9.js
213 ms
show.chunk.687c11980651d69638fc.js
195 ms
menu-indicator-down.png
473 ms
login
144 ms
collect
34 ms
get_file_from_url.html
148 ms
get_file_from_url.html
153 ms
style.css
140 ms
de40bb50-49fd-4ce4-b305-00436c854ff7.png
54 ms
paul-graham-online.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
paul-graham-online.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
paul-graham-online.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paul-graham-online.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paul-graham-online.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
paul-graham-online.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Paulgraham Online. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: