8.9 sec in total
3.7 sec
4.7 sec
532 ms
Welcome to paydayrankings.com homepage info - get ready to check Paydayrankings best content right away, or after learning these important things about paydayrankings.com
This website is for sale! paydayrankings.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, paydayranki...
Visit paydayrankings.comWe analyzed Paydayrankings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.7 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
paydayrankings.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value4.5 s
82/100
10%
3669 ms
167 ms
144 ms
158 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Paydayrankings.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 5% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Paydayrankings.com.
Page size can be reduced by 845.9 kB (61%)
1.4 MB
544.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Paydayrankings.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 901.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 127.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Paydayrankings images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 592.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 592.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 106.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paydayrankings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 106.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (51%)
74
36
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paydayrankings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
paydayrankings.com
3669 ms
dropshadowboxes.css
167 ms
testimonials-widget.css
144 ms
wp-customer-reviews.css
158 ms
style.css
149 ms
facebook-btn.css
163 ms
widgets.css
194 ms
default.min.css
267 ms
sharing.css
239 ms
style.css
276 ms
widget-grid-and-list.css
238 ms
jquery.js
306 ms
wp-customer-reviews.js
285 ms
frontend.js
331 ms
default.css
338 ms
vertical-m.css
68 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
addthis_widget.js
14 ms
counter_xhtml.js
18 ms
css
36 ms
css
47 ms
style-mobile.css
351 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
353 ms
ZeroClipboard.js
354 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
60 ms
wpgroho.js
352 ms
e-201611.js
15 ms
e-201611.js
29 ms
css
14 ms
DMCA_badge_grn_100w.png
49 ms
back2top.png
158 ms
payday-loan-ratings-reviews.png
159 ms
cashnetusa-cashnet-review-200x150.jpg
160 ms
stars.png
156 ms
cashnetusa-cashnet-review-150x150.jpg
158 ms
cashnet-usa-review-application-2-150x150.jpg
184 ms
cashnet-cashnetusa-review-application-states-150x150.jpg
184 ms
prosper.com-review-200x150.jpg
210 ms
TrustedPayDay-Loan-Reviews-200x150.jpg
202 ms
mypaydayloan.com-reviews-200x150.jpg
216 ms
justclickhereloans-review1-200x150.jpg
218 ms
paydayloantoday.com-review-200x150.jpg
262 ms
moneymart-review-200x150.jpg
251 ms
quickerloanz-payday-review-200x150.jpg
288 ms
cashcorner.org-Reviews-200x150.jpg
310 ms
cashcentral-payday-loan-review-200x150.gif
311 ms
Facebook.png
322 ms
Twitter.png
325 ms
Google.png
359 ms
Delicious.png
361 ms
Tumblr.png
387 ms
ca-pub-6330179797238662.js
120 ms
zrt_lookup.html
37 ms
show_ads_impl.js
48 ms
mantra_dot2.png
361 ms
tocc.css
364 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
443 ms
tocc.js
440 ms
ads
350 ms
osd.js
15 ms
ads
334 ms
expand-icon.gif
112 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
39 ms
t.php
163 ms
1436103669415962883
94 ms
abg.js
93 ms
m_js_controller.js
129 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
89 ms
rxxXUYj4oZ6Q5oDJFtEd6i3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
33 ms
WoAoVT7K3k7hHfxKbvB6B0FBUwxZoPEX5aisj8qBSHE.ttf
35 ms
g.gif
31 ms
300lo.json
67 ms
hovercard.css
62 ms
services.css
85 ms
s
47 ms
x_button_blue2.png
23 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
44 ms
paydayrankings.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
paydayrankings.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
paydayrankings.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paydayrankings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paydayrankings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
paydayrankings.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Paydayrankings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: