5.2 sec in total
339 ms
4.4 sec
490 ms
Visit payneconsulting.com now to see the best up-to-date Payneconsulting content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about payneconsulting.com
Visit payneconsulting.comWe analyzed Payneconsulting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
payneconsulting.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value2.9 s
82/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value110 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value3.3 s
94/100
10%
339 ms
413 ms
156 ms
235 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Payneconsulting.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) relates to the external source Thepaynegroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 746.1 kB (20%)
3.8 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Payneconsulting.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 336.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Payneconsulting images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 221.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Payneconsulting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 172.3 kB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (32%)
34
23
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Payneconsulting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.thepaynegroup.com
339 ms
foundation.css
413 ms
general_foundicons.css
156 ms
t3.css
235 ms
my.css
159 ms
jquery-2.0.3.min.js
542 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
306 ms
foundation.min.js
573 ms
custom.modernizr.js
315 ms
test.js
312 ms
swipe.js
319 ms
css
24 ms
logo_full_size.png
88 ms
tag-icons.png
80 ms
icn-workflow.svg
85 ms
icn-security.svg
81 ms
logo_text.png
86 ms
facebook-48.png
85 ms
linkedin-48.png
159 ms
twitter-48.png
158 ms
instagram-badge-48.png
166 ms
analytics.js
9 ms
482074.js
102 ms
collect
24 ms
icn-forms.svg
425 ms
icn-numbering.svg
113 ms
icn-metadata.svg
115 ms
icn-redact.svg
190 ms
icn-outlook.svg
186 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
15 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
30 ms
getimg.php
582 ms
getimg.php
735 ms
getimg.php
336 ms
getimg.php
3424 ms
getimg.php
1002 ms
__ptq.gif
15 ms
payneconsulting.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
payneconsulting.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
payneconsulting.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Payneconsulting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Payneconsulting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
payneconsulting.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Payneconsulting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: