4.8 sec in total
380 ms
4 sec
455 ms
Welcome to pdfeditor.de homepage info - get ready to check Pdf Editor best content right away, or after learning these important things about pdfeditor.de
Mit PDF Editor kannst Du unter Windows Dateien bearbeiten, zusammenfügen, trennen und ändern. PdfEditor kommt OHNE Abo und ist "Made in Germany"!
Visit pdfeditor.deWe analyzed Pdfeditor.de page load time and found that the first response time was 380 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
pdfeditor.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value4.0 s
51/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value530 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
380 ms
640 ms
134 ms
269 ms
401 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pdfeditor.de, 97% (30 requests) were made to Pixelplanet.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Pixelplanet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 293.1 kB (30%)
985.0 kB
691.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Pdfeditor.de main page is 985.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 604.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.0 kB, which is 31% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pdf Editor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 97.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.4 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 157.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pdfeditor.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 157.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (24%)
29
22
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pdf Editor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pdfeditor.de
380 ms
pdfeditor-info.html
640 ms
bootstrap.min.css
134 ms
style-pdfeditor.min.css
269 ms
font-awesome.min.css
401 ms
parallax-slider.min.css
406 ms
pixelplanet-logo.png
482 ms
Boxshot-PdfEditor3-700x400.png
570 ms
edit-pdf.png
2938 ms
Briefpapier-Dialog-700x400.png
600 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
682 ms
merged.min.js
1159 ms
modernizr.js
556 ms
jquery.cslider.min.js
697 ms
app.min.js
708 ms
Hauptfenster-Text-ausgewaehlt-555x312.png
1046 ms
Schwaerzen-Dialog-555x312.png
2048 ms
PdfEditor-PDF-kommentieren-und-markieren-555x312.png
824 ms
PdfEditor-PDF-Dokumente-zusammenfuehren-555x312.png
851 ms
PdfEditor-OCR-555x312.png
1273 ms
Boxshot-PdfEditor3-250x320.png
1135 ms
bg-pdfeditor.jpg
788 ms
bg-heading-pdfeditor.png
855 ms
bg-text.png
857 ms
arrows.png
929 ms
breadcrumbs.png
994 ms
icons.png
1633 ms
pixelplanet-logo-bottom.png
983 ms
opensans-regular.woff
1177 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2251 ms
up.png
695 ms
pdfeditor.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
pdfeditor.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
pdfeditor.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pdfeditor.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pdfeditor.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pdfeditor.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pdf Editor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: