1.6 sec in total
218 ms
828 ms
526 ms
Click here to check amazing PEERS content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about peers.press
Rethinking scholarship for the digital era by giving academics tools to produce, review and share knowledge in ,an entirely transparent system.
Visit peers.pressWe analyzed Peers.press page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
peers.press performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
91/100
10%
Value2.3 s
92/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value2.4 s
99/100
10%
218 ms
208 ms
252 ms
211 ms
61 ms
Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Peers.press, 5% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (371 ms) belongs to the original domain Peers.press.
Page size can be reduced by 35.9 kB (76%)
47.2 kB
11.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Peers.press main page is 47.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 47.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
15
15
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PEERS. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
peers.press
218 ms
0.GmlCiCCD.css
208 ms
Spinner.EzBlMk9G.css
252 ms
3.CW-OaLUe.css
211 ms
beacon.min.js
61 ms
amidex-light-9c2182b092affd656cd010285788942e.png
194 ms
hero.svg
67 ms
knowledgelab-light-66f08579edee8d2297c8dd67b453a7fd.png
337 ms
prism.svg
100 ms
stack.svg
106 ms
exchange.svg
117 ms
publish.svg
160 ms
network.svg
169 ms
review.svg
177 ms
grow.svg
213 ms
secure.svg
242 ms
support.svg
234 ms
independance.svg
297 ms
columbia-light-12ff111181f747332078242da7127b3a.png
344 ms
fac-light-ccff15c004f3d3a2ec7b69edccc89958.png
366 ms
ldpsc-light-9e833d841dab32ed94d5437f34761a2b.png
371 ms
Satoshi-Variable.ttf
257 ms
peers.press accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
peers.press best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
peers.press SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Peers.press can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed French language. Our system also found out that Peers.press main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
peers.press
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of PEERS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: