4.7 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.3 sec
190 ms
Visit perfect.ba now to see the best up-to-date Perfect content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about perfect.ba
Visit perfect.baWe analyzed Perfect.ba page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
perfect.ba performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value9.5 s
12/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
1199 ms
184 ms
213 ms
203 ms
211 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Perfect.ba, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Perfect.ba.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (73%)
3.2 MB
859.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Perfect.ba main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Perfect images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 882.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 882.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Perfect.ba needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (76%)
93
22
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Perfect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
perfect.ba
1199 ms
language-selector.css
184 ms
visual-form-builder.min.css
213 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.min.css
203 ms
farbtastic.css
211 ms
chosen.css
209 ms
css
28 ms
font-awesome.min.css
204 ms
jquery-ui.css
277 ms
bootstrap.min.css
388 ms
animate.min.css
298 ms
flexslider.min.css
301 ms
jquery.selectbox.css
301 ms
listing_style.css
304 ms
mobile.css
370 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
395 ms
shortcodes.css
396 ms
ts.css
408 ms
bwg_frontend.css
406 ms
sumoselect.css
464 ms
font-awesome.css
481 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
484 ms
settings.css
490 ms
jquery.accordion.css
510 ms
style.css
608 ms
mobile.css
557 ms
settings.css
574 ms
wp.css
581 ms
social-likes.css
585 ms
js_composer.min.css
813 ms
css
27 ms
jquery.js
745 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
666 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
878 ms
bwg_frontend.js
677 ms
jquery.sumoselect.min.js
704 ms
jquery.mobile.js
759 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
773 ms
api.js
37 ms
jquery.fullscreen-0.4.1.js
728 ms
bwg_gallery_box.js
690 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
760 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
778 ms
rightclickdisable.js
707 ms
jquery.accordion.js
723 ms
listing.js
736 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
704 ms
jquery.cookie.js
795 ms
bootstrap.js
794 ms
jquery.selectbox-0.2.js
794 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
788 ms
core.min.js
722 ms
widget.min.js
704 ms
mouse.min.js
753 ms
sortable.min.js
763 ms
retina.js
753 ms
wow.js
769 ms
main.js
716 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
712 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
743 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
738 ms
jquery.easing.js
731 ms
social-likes.min.js
683 ms
wp-embed.min.js
666 ms
sitepress.js
692 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
722 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
706 ms
vfb-validation.min.js
670 ms
jquery.metadata.min.js
661 ms
messages-en_US.js
637 ms
datepicker.min.js
629 ms
datepicker-en_US.js
645 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1090 ms
bs.png
864 ms
en.png
861 ms
toolbar_shadow.png
862 ms
logoMAIN.png
863 ms
header_shadow.png
863 ms
slajder_prva.jpg
871 ms
slajder_druga.jpg
865 ms
slajder_treca-1.jpg
866 ms
pocetna-1.gif
867 ms
kontakt_mob_poc.jpg
791 ms
arrow-up.png
785 ms
timer.png
783 ms
message-shadow.png
789 ms
social.png
789 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
48 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
48 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
49 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
49 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
49 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
968 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
972 ms
recaptcha__en.js
59 ms
staticmap
152 ms
loader.gif
220 ms
large_left.png
221 ms
large_right.png
222 ms
logoMAIN.png
220 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
222 ms
perfect.ba accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
perfect.ba best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
perfect.ba SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
SR
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Perfect.ba can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Serbian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Perfect.ba main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
perfect.ba
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Perfect. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: