Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

pfiffel.com

Pfiffel.com

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

562 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

175 ms

pfiffel.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pfiffel.com homepage info - get ready to check Pfiffel best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about pfiffel.com

Visit pfiffel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pfiffel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 562 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pfiffel.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,250 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pfiffel.com

562 ms

style.css

123 ms

adsbygoogle.js

14 ms

show_ads.js

21 ms

ca-pub-2430843555198080.js

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Pfiffel.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (562 ms) belongs to the original domain Pfiffel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 188.4 kB (51%)

Content Size

367.0 kB

After Optimization

178.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Pfiffel.com main page is 367.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 275.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 6.9 kB
  • After minification 6.4 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 46.0 kB

  • Original 82.3 kB
  • After minification 36.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pfiffel needs image optimization as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 56% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 135.6 kB

  • Original 275.6 kB
  • After minification 275.4 kB
  • After compression 140.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.6 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 585 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pfiffel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (47%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pfiffel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pfiffel.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

pfiffel.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

pfiffel.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pfiffel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pfiffel.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pfiffel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: