1.8 sec in total
391 ms
1.2 sec
183 ms
Visit photogap.me now to see the best up-to-date Photogap content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about photogap.me
Over 16,000,000 people used this apps and share their best moment to facebook
Visit photogap.meWe analyzed Photogap.me page load time and found that the first response time was 391 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
photogap.me performance score
391 ms
464 ms
27 ms
19 ms
83 ms
Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Photogap.me, 58% (7 requests) were made to Static.photogap.me and 17% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (464 ms) relates to the external source Static.photogap.me.
Page size can be reduced by 144.8 kB (49%)
294.8 kB
150.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Photogap.me main page is 294.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 122.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Photogap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 102.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Photogap.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 102.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
10
10
The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Photogap. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
photogap.me
391 ms
style.min.css
464 ms
bootstrap.min.css
27 ms
jquery-2.1.4.min.js
19 ms
bg-web.png
83 ms
app3_cover.jpg
239 ms
app2_cover.jpg
317 ms
app1_cover.jpg
268 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
bg-top-header.png
181 ms
collect
11 ms
ahronbd.ttf
302 ms
photogap.me SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Photogap.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Photogap.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
photogap.me
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Photogap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: