3.7 sec in total
94 ms
2.3 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Phylmar content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about phylmar.com
We empower our communities of EHS and sustainability professionals by providing the resources they need to protect the health and safety of their stakeholders, promote a sustainable environment, and e...
Visit phylmar.comWe analyzed Phylmar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
phylmar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value7.7 s
25/100
10%
Value920 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.296
40/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
94 ms
54 ms
138 ms
75 ms
152 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Phylmar.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Phylmar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 271.0 kB (12%)
2.3 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Phylmar.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 166.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Phylmar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Phylmar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (65%)
71
25
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phylmar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
phylmar.com
94 ms
www.phylmar.com
54 ms
www.phylmar.com
138 ms
gtm.js
75 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
152 ms
style.min.css
145 ms
styles.css
158 ms
email-subscribers-public.css
37 ms
responsive-tooltip.css
156 ms
ivory-search.min.css
151 ms
font-awesome.min.css
53 ms
style.css
74 ms
rgs.css
136 ms
style.css
153 ms
magnific.css
207 ms
responsive.css
223 ms
select2.css
231 ms
ascend.css
221 ms
js_composer.min.css
182 ms
css
58 ms
jquery.min.js
244 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
196 ms
modernizr.js
197 ms
signup-form-widget.min.js
152 ms
style.css
195 ms
core.min.js
433 ms
menu.min.js
436 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
239 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
439 ms
dom-ready.min.js
437 ms
hooks.min.js
432 ms
i18n.min.js
440 ms
a11y.min.js
433 ms
autocomplete.min.js
435 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
437 ms
index.js
444 ms
index.js
438 ms
email-subscribers-public.js
444 ms
responsive-tooltip.js
436 ms
magnific.js
444 ms
superfish.js
437 ms
init.js
439 ms
touchswipe.min.js
412 ms
select2.min.js
394 ms
analytics.js
85 ms
ivory-search.min.js
318 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
313 ms
js.cookie.js
302 ms
custom.js
302 ms
collect
29 ms
collect
225 ms
logo.png
377 ms
Phylmar-Client-Value-rev2-Graphic.jpg
948 ms
afirm-logo-transparency.png
376 ms
lead.png
375 ms
online-1.png
376 ms
presentation.png
375 ms
univ.png
943 ms
spinner.gif
942 ms
white_ender_logo.png
941 ms
ga-audiences
888 ms
www.phylmar.com
889 ms
hero-image-desaturated.jpg
891 ms
icon-forums.png
1152 ms
icon-academy.png
1153 ms
icon-affiliates.png
1153 ms
consulting-sectional-pic.jpg
1154 ms
PRR-banner.jpg
1151 ms
toyota-1.gif
1149 ms
varian-logo.png
1285 ms
sempra-energy-logo.png
1284 ms
underscore-min.js
862 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
969 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
969 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
968 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
969 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf
834 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
945 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf
1121 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf
1120 ms
co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQEl5fvg-N.ttf
1121 ms
co3YmX5slCNuHLi8bLeY9MK7whWMhyjQdl9fvg-N.ttf
1120 ms
icomoon.woff
1123 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1124 ms
api.js
391 ms
phylmar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
phylmar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
phylmar.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phylmar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phylmar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
phylmar.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phylmar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: