2.2 sec in total
382 ms
1.5 sec
327 ms
Visit pingtank.com now to see the best up-to-date Pingtank content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pingtank.com
PingTank.com
Visit pingtank.comWe analyzed Pingtank.com page load time and found that the first response time was 382 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
pingtank.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.114
86/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
382 ms
128 ms
267 ms
59 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pingtank.com, 42% (10 requests) were made to Az773215.vo.msecnd.net and 25% (6 requests) were made to Az713377.vo.msecnd.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (810 ms) relates to the external source Az713377.vo.msecnd.net.
Page size can be reduced by 611.0 kB (42%)
1.5 MB
842.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Pingtank.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 703.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pingtank images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 502.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 502.0 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pingtank.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 93.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
17
17
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pingtank. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
pingtank.com
382 ms
main-e68ad2d8cb218f7464a3.css.gz
128 ms
main-e68ad2d8cb218f7464a3.js.gz
267 ms
css
59 ms
analytics.js
25 ms
1e7b6a26-f0c9-4f04-a318-453205578530_160x160.gif
561 ms
999e975efaa155d2f7c120a47608ed93.jpg
232 ms
d0558d91063038236b60e3ef71fdc1fd.svg
284 ms
c7d757bf53b2de928aa36177c823cc3e.svg
326 ms
12c6f002-cb88-40b1-beba-613858df4375_160x160.gif
580 ms
ea26d931-7fe8-4627-8ae2-ac3140d93191_160x160.gif
643 ms
4fdbcc67-2def-450b-abe5-c6978eb55b6f_160x160.gif
746 ms
203da480-bdf7-11e4-bb27-d16a81d6ad7e_160x160.gif
703 ms
451530f0-be08-11e4-9b1c-f3143cd197cc_160x160.gif
810 ms
collect
173 ms
076b65579ab39d6c6f0df33275391d6b.woff
134 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
87 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
92 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
134 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
135 ms
d86c2c0f4f8897528e43890e0c1d48de.ttf
133 ms
3bebeda34423a2bc9023461ab1e13af9.png
54 ms
ffc2c79479696d8ed4866ee6f73b4cbf.png
129 ms
e119c60d1ee7f5c7f7c5e9a473ca9874.png
107 ms
pingtank.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
pingtank.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
pingtank.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pingtank.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pingtank.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pingtank.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pingtank. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: