5.2 sec in total
29 ms
3.2 sec
2 sec
Welcome to pitchmark.com homepage info - get ready to check Pitchmark best content right away, or after learning these important things about pitchmark.com
Pitchmark are the go-to line marking manufacturer for sports worldwide. Supplying line marking paint & machines to all levels of sport.
Visit pitchmark.comWe analyzed Pitchmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
pitchmark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value4.5 s
37/100
25%
Value13.0 s
2/100
10%
Value2,890 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.103
89/100
15%
Value20.0 s
2/100
10%
29 ms
1996 ms
121 ms
134 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Pitchmark.com, 15% (14 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 12% (11 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Pitchmark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 470.4 kB (29%)
1.6 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Pitchmark.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 780.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 449.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 449.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pitchmark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pitchmark.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 67 (74%)
90
23
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pitchmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pitchmark.com
29 ms
pitchmark.com
1996 ms
main.min.css
121 ms
css
134 ms
menu-animation.min.css
112 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
112 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
123 ms
styles.css
122 ms
style.min.css
127 ms
style.min.css
127 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
121 ms
cms-navigation.css
185 ms
style.css
184 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
207 ms
swiper.min.css
203 ms
post-2635.css
196 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
196 ms
global.css
249 ms
post-23406.css
251 ms
post-24987.css
262 ms
style.min.css
264 ms
font-awesome.min.css
269 ms
post-29962.css
272 ms
css
125 ms
jquery.min.js
126 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
345 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
345 ms
widget-theme-elements.min.css
351 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
350 ms
widget-posts.min.css
346 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
344 ms
swiper-bundle.css
369 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
376 ms
animations.min.css
408 ms
language-cookie.js
406 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
105 ms
bilmur.min.js
115 ms
frontend.min.js
406 ms
image-cdn.js
496 ms
happy-addons.min.js
491 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
493 ms
e-202404.js
111 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
496 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
109 ms
make-column-clickable.js
496 ms
jetpack-carousel.min.js
498 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
108 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
110 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
113 ms
hooks.min.js
112 ms
i18n.min.js
113 ms
core.min.js
112 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
543 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
459 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
462 ms
frontend.min.js
450 ms
waypoints.min.js
450 ms
frontend.min.js
450 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
474 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
416 ms
World-Cup-2022-White.png
329 ms
Pitchmark-White-Oval.png
343 ms
en.svg
371 ms
de.svg
342 ms
da.svg
339 ms
fr.svg
345 ms
fi.svg
344 ms
nl.svg
373 ms
sv.svg
374 ms
ar.svg
376 ms
it.svg
400 ms
MiB_Logo_Stacked_White.png
186 ms
QA_white_2019.png
342 ms
Ecoline-Line-Marking-Paint-White.jpg
68 ms
Hybrid-Line-Marking-Machine.jpg
56 ms
LineFix-Line-Marking-Accessories-WEB.jpg
66 ms
Clubline-White-10L.jpg
89 ms
Classic-Line-Marker-Web-1.jpg
178 ms
PMK-Line-Marking-Handbook-2.jpg
172 ms
LineFix-White.jpg
175 ms
Concentrate-vs-Ready-To-Use-Line-Marking-Paint-1.jpg
173 ms
Spray-vs-wheel-to-wheel.jpg
179 ms
Home-Page-Hero-Images-Square-1.jpg
178 ms
saudi-trip-blog-cover.jpg
237 ms
Footer-Logos-1.svg
387 ms
Pitchmark-Global-Square-Logo.jpg
419 ms
White-Grid.svg
308 ms
Green-Grid.svg
310 ms
h9hzc0pc93
134 ms
gtm.js
131 ms
clarity.js
27 ms
9709d72052178fa471d398bedff81bac.js
484 ms
pitchmark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
pitchmark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
pitchmark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pitchmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pitchmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pitchmark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pitchmark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: