Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 42

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

196 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

199 ms

pixeffect.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pixeffect content for Romania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pixeffect.net

Visit pixeffect.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Pixeffect.net page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pixeffect.net performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,970 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pixeffect.net

196 ms

pixeffect.net

288 ms

main.css

128 ms

simple-slider.css

190 ms

jquery-ui.css

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Pixeffect.net, 12% (10 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (532 ms) relates to the external source U.heatmap.it.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 266.3 kB (55%)

Content Size

481.8 kB

After Optimization

215.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Pixeffect.net main page is 481.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 344.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 18.4 kB

  • Original 24.2 kB
  • After minification 23.6 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 82.5 kB
  • After minification 66.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Pixeffect needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 210.2 kB

  • Original 344.5 kB
  • After minification 331.7 kB
  • After compression 134.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 210.2 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 30.6 kB
  • After minification 28.1 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixeffect.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (56%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixeffect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

pixeffect.net accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

pixeffect.net best practices score

42

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

pixeffect.net SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixeffect.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Pixeffect.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixeffect. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: