4.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.1 sec
217 ms
Visit pixel.it now to see the best up-to-date Pixel content for Italy and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about pixel.it
Pixel centro assistenza autorizzato Apple Torino Corso Francesco Ferrucci 70
Visit pixel.itWe analyzed Pixel.it page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
pixel.it performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value7.5 s
4/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
1055 ms
248 ms
250 ms
361 ms
242 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Pixel.it, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixel.it.
Page size can be reduced by 411.0 kB (60%)
682.7 kB
271.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Pixel.it main page is 682.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 376.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pixel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 258.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 258.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixel.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (52%)
29
14
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pixel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixel.it
1055 ms
system.css
248 ms
position.css
250 ms
layout.css
361 ms
general.css
242 ms
personal.css
588 ms
screen.css
294 ms
mootools-core.js
842 ms
core.js
491 ms
caption.js
491 ms
mootools-more.js
1147 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
6 ms
style.css
614 ms
scrollbars.js
848 ms
script.js
730 ms
system.css
608 ms
logosm.png
137 ms
menu-1.png
249 ms
menu-2.png
367 ms
menu-3.png
254 ms
menu-4.png
246 ms
menu-5.png
249 ms
menu-6.png
380 ms
logo.png
609 ms
32x32-facebookOK.png
491 ms
centro-assistenza.png
492 ms
przez.png
486 ms
ga.js
8 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
print.css
238 ms
pixel.it accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pixel.it best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
pixel.it SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
IT
IT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixel.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixel.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixel.it
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pixel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: