7.3 sec in total
546 ms
6 sec
816 ms
Click here to check amazing PIXER content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pixer.tv
Corporate Video, Event Video and Aerial video Production Company in Germany. Conference video, imagefilm, Videoproduktion Firma NRW Essen -German.
Visit pixer.tvWe analyzed Pixer.tv page load time and found that the first response time was 546 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
pixer.tv performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.8 s
2/100
10%
Value14.6 s
0/100
25%
Value22.3 s
0/100
10%
Value3,430 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.6 s
3/100
10%
546 ms
266 ms
414 ms
575 ms
558 ms
Our browser made a total of 143 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (113 requests) were addressed to the original Pixer.tv, 7% (10 requests) were made to Player.vimeo.com and 7% (10 requests) were made to I.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pixer.tv.
Page size can be reduced by 482.4 kB (9%)
5.3 MB
4.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Pixer.tv main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 276.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PIXER images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 56.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pixer.tv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 24% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 85 (60%)
141
56
The browser has sent 141 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PIXER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 83 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pixer.tv
546 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
266 ms
40djd.css
414 ms
63u74.css
575 ms
40djd.css
558 ms
40djd.js
488 ms
40djd.js
328 ms
40djd.js
375 ms
40djd.css
378 ms
core.min.js
427 ms
mouse.min.js
463 ms
draggable.min.js
509 ms
droppable.min.js
580 ms
resizable.min.js
581 ms
selectable.min.js
622 ms
sortable.min.js
655 ms
accordion.min.js
657 ms
menu.min.js
655 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
657 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
683 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
729 ms
dom-ready.min.js
774 ms
hooks.min.js
787 ms
i18n.min.js
775 ms
a11y.min.js
775 ms
autocomplete.min.js
797 ms
controlgroup.min.js
840 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
882 ms
button.min.js
886 ms
datepicker.min.js
906 ms
dialog.min.js
897 ms
effect.min.js
924 ms
effect-blind.min.js
941 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
996 ms
effect-clip.min.js
998 ms
effect-drop.min.js
1008 ms
api.js
38 ms
effect-explode.min.js
1024 ms
effect-fade.min.js
837 ms
effect-fold.min.js
788 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
805 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
767 ms
effect-size.min.js
741 ms
effect-scale.min.js
726 ms
effect-shake.min.js
762 ms
effect-slide.min.js
703 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
726 ms
progressbar.min.js
687 ms
ga.js
138 ms
310491136
230 ms
286039164
277 ms
337884600
276 ms
297407957
278 ms
229892053
253 ms
776680331
254 ms
369453732
377 ms
776660504
373 ms
620852888
605 ms
700028879
439 ms
embed
308 ms
slider.min.js
663 ms
spinner.min.js
678 ms
tabs.min.js
668 ms
tooltip.min.js
671 ms
jquery.form.min.js
696 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
743 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
690 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
704 ms
doubletaptogo.js
743 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
modernizr.min.js
686 ms
751094240-7a237bae3f3a6df6f019ddf80b7c53d59eca7619b2a060aac9d89ddcc44b7237-d
83 ms
jquery.appear.js
745 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
744 ms
absoluteCounter.min.js
744 ms
easypiechart.js
727 ms
723299563-f618fb7c46881bbdaf9e43340c3aca1ef9ae1835f1b55be0f7a142604bcb9a7a-d
59 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
722 ms
1558543522-f9f3abfd23bc189b2a53d9c2f1bb537ac155852462ad2d1313e52701dba9e165-d
66 ms
785137304-9934c4d2f94a9e9f17fe5a60932ad77d77205f65d1015cbed43ac9ff46370c26-d
597 ms
720844645-b09440c10815d18f01e521e55e59918578d03568afbc576a5243282ebdd901d3-d
61 ms
735084049-6da56fdc78cec37c9b25da0d4cda8691774b035798f28aa03a23c7b3e2eb03d0-d
65 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
723 ms
js
59 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
710 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
692 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
726 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
715 ms
1558456353-9c447ae6b21a7e59938b17c66f159fbc3453a6ccfb4036d5e745e24c87d76b0d-d
497 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
715 ms
1512773421-dc82a4625df39172da7d6db18d2c8db3ab6a63e1e356e911eebf386d2bb6c514-d
355 ms
waypoints.min.js
726 ms
1415130598-d8e1629446d980c22f5d33aa0fc2324cac90f31d08262b8a93be2f2fe3c9a15d-d
1076 ms
jplayer.min.js
700 ms
bootstrap.carousel.js
717 ms
skrollr.js
721 ms
jquery.touchwipe.min.js
720 ms
Chart.min.js
723 ms
default_dynamic.js
737 ms
default.min.js
710 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
726 ms
qode-like.js
736 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
715 ms
1263158342-7c53a59d2b456d25778c1967e9df23ca6c38a1aa07780c334
42 ms
mailcheck.min.js
698 ms
punycode.min.js
710 ms
utils.min.js
706 ms
wpforms.min.js
737 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
949 ms
Pixer-Logo-1701-150x68.png
804 ms
Pixer-Logo-170-dark-150x68.png
773 ms
Header-V2.jpg
969 ms
DSR04048-scaled.jpg
1321 ms
PXR07835-scaled.jpg
1607 ms
DSR02418-scaled.jpg
1196 ms
PXR02413-scaled.jpg
1178 ms
DSR03824-1-scaled.jpg
1389 ms
DSR05070-scaled.jpg
1634 ms
DSR06529-scaled.jpg
2252 ms
DSC08819-scaled.jpg
1251 ms
netflix.png
1274 ms
nikon.png
1364 ms
Primark.png
1375 ms
samsung.png
1355 ms
huawei.png
1419 ms
lonza.png
1426 ms
sexy-hair.png
1409 ms
mediabroadcast.png
1458 ms
eutelsat.png
1462 ms
dalet.png
1472 ms
submit-spin.svg
1446 ms
logo-cookieyes.svg
1443 ms
pattern8.gif
1470 ms
893.jpg
1474 ms
werbeagentuer-messefilm-imagefilm-essen-short.jpg
1617 ms
social_share_purple.png
1211 ms
logo.png
1220 ms
hcaptcha.html
34 ms
hcaptcha.html
40 ms
hcaptcha.js
19 ms
checksiteconfig
64 ms
hsw.js
25 ms
pixel-video.png
1052 ms
pixer.tv accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pixer.tv best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
pixer.tv SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pixer.tv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pixer.tv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pixer.tv
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PIXER. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: