Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

planet.com

Planet | Homepage

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

407 ms

planet.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to planet.com homepage info - get ready to check Planet best content for China right away, or after learning these important things about planet.com

Leading provider of daily data & insights about Earth, Planet helps organizations harness change for action with a multidimensional view of our changing planet

Visit planet.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Planet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

planet.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

57/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,710 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.172

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.9 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

planet.com

179 ms

www.planet.com

516 ms

pygments.css

95 ms

coderay.css

188 ms

application.css

403 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Planet.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Planetgallery.global.ssl.fastly.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Planet.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 822.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

3.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Planet.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 27.6 kB
  • After minification 22.9 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 3.5 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Planet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 480.4 kB

  • Original 742.3 kB
  • After minification 684.9 kB
  • After compression 262.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 480.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 298.3 kB

  • Original 351.9 kB
  • After minification 346.6 kB
  • After compression 53.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Planet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 298.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (58%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Planet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

planet.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

planet.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

planet.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Planet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Planet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Planet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: