Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

planetgreen.org

** x **

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

707 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

940 ms

planetgreen.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to planetgreen.org homepage info - get ready to check Planetgreen best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about planetgreen.org

Visit planetgreen.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Planetgreen.org page load time and found that the first response time was 707 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

planetgreen.org performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.9 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

planetgreen.org

707 ms

styles.css

354 ms

serverpic.jpg

655 ms

hillary.jpg

463 ms

K%20letter.png

793 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Planetgreen.org, 5% (1 request) were made to S3.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Planetgreen.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 260.1 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Planetgreen.org main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 56.3 kB

  • Original 75.6 kB
  • After minification 59.6 kB
  • After compression 19.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.0 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 190.7 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Planetgreen needs image optimization as it can save up to 190.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 16.0 kB
  • After minification 10.7 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Planetgreen.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Planetgreen. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

planetgreen.org accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

planetgreen.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

planetgreen.org SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Planetgreen.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Planetgreen.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Planetgreen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: