4.5 sec in total
1 sec
2 sec
1.5 sec
Visit plasticbag.org now to see the best up-to-date Plasticbag content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about plasticbag.org
Visit plasticbag.orgWe analyzed Plasticbag.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
plasticbag.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
45/100
10%
Value3.2 s
74/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
1016 ms
160 ms
162 ms
154 ms
142 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Plasticbag.org, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Plasticbag.org.
Page size can be reduced by 570.7 kB (47%)
1.2 MB
635.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Plasticbag.org main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 529.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Plasticbag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 349.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 349.5 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 160.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Plasticbag.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 160.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (58%)
36
15
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Plasticbag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
plasticbag.org
1016 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
160 ms
style.css
162 ms
font-awesome.css
154 ms
media-queries.css
142 ms
flexslider.css
146 ms
css
24 ms
css
35 ms
jquery.js
287 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
259 ms
ga.js
30 ms
__utm.gif
57 ms
social-style.css
13 ms
social-icons.css
14 ms
fontello.css
16 ms
custom.js
17 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
122 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
122 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
123 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
122 ms
wp-embed.min.js
123 ms
x28167ac04f89c3e8318fa68a3462873.png
94 ms
cartographer-dark.png
75 ms
plasticbag2.png
73 ms
note-left.png
72 ms
note-line.png
73 ms
shoulder.jpg
75 ms
EAqh528fFdbUek8UOky4sA.woff
560 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
590 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
593 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
592 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
591 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
558 ms
fontello.woff
559 ms
loading.gif
47 ms
232517
52 ms
player.js
98 ms
player.css
82 ms
ga.js
20 ms
vuid.min.js
92 ms
__utm.gif
29 ms
proxy.html
32 ms
48137296.webp
61 ms
plasticbag.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
plasticbag.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
plasticbag.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Plasticbag.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Plasticbag.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
plasticbag.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Plasticbag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: