7.9 sec in total
1.3 sec
5.2 sec
1.5 sec
Visit polygraphiya.ru now to see the best up-to-date Polygraphiya content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about polygraphiya.ru
Профессиональная оперативная полиграфия представляет собой комплексные услуги верстальщика, дизайнера, специалиста по макетам, оператора станка и других.
Visit polygraphiya.ruWe analyzed Polygraphiya.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
polygraphiya.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value3,300 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.513
15/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
1260 ms
45 ms
46 ms
846 ms
823 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Polygraphiya.ru, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Polygraphiya.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 694.7 kB (70%)
994.0 kB
299.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Polygraphiya.ru main page is 994.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 452.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Polygraphiya needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 273.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 273.9 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 354.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Polygraphiya.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 354.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (87%)
55
7
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Polygraphiya. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
polygraphiya.ru
1260 ms
css
45 ms
css
46 ms
lightbox.css
846 ms
style.min.css
823 ms
style.css
627 ms
style.css
618 ms
shortcodes.css
627 ms
wp-banners.css
719 ms
fonts.css
735 ms
sumoselect.min.css
735 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
751 ms
styles.min.css
921 ms
pagenavi-css.css
847 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1065 ms
font-awesome.min.css
19 ms
style.css
987 ms
red.css
928 ms
jquery.mmenu.all.css
954 ms
no_thumb.css
953 ms
social-likes_birman.css
1023 ms
jquery.min.js
552 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
1026 ms
jquery.sumoselect.min.js
1170 ms
jquery.mobile.min.js
1063 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
1104 ms
jquery.fullscreen-0.4.1.min.js
1122 ms
scripts.min.js
1339 ms
social-likes.min.js
1187 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
800 ms
watch.js
492 ms
top100.jcn
358 ms
mousewheel.min.js
709 ms
lightbox.js
917 ms
custom.js
761 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
778 ms
custom-banners.js
778 ms
bootstrap.min.js
58 ms
custom.js
820 ms
script.min.js
977 ms
wide.js
886 ms
comment-reply.min.js
887 ms
openapi.js
261 ms
bootstrap-shortcodes-tooltip.js
891 ms
bootstrap-shortcodes-popover.js
846 ms
wp-embed.min.js
894 ms
style.css
808 ms
standard_style.css
818 ms
openapi.js
634 ms
top100.jcn
1220 ms
fbevents.js
280 ms
polygraphiya.ru
701 ms
logo.png
535 ms
rss.png
524 ms
watch.js
14 ms
jizYRExUiTo99u79D0e0w8mNAjcQ-w.ttf
299 ms
jizdRExUiTo99u79D0e8fOydKxUY0TA7iw.ttf
449 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0aEwMOPIDU.ttf
308 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OqtKB8a8zI.ttf
449 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISma2RmV9Su1fah.ttf
453 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Oma2RmV9Su1fah.ttf
314 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
284 ms
hit
456 ms
1928159667413284
278 ms
hit
679 ms
ga.js
44 ms
__utm.gif
56 ms
advert.gif
239 ms
1
261 ms
polygraphiya.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
polygraphiya.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
polygraphiya.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Polygraphiya.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Polygraphiya.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
polygraphiya.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Polygraphiya. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: