Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

portemonnaie.org

Portemonnaie Vergleich 2023: Geldbörsen, Geldbeutel & Brieftaschen

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

390 ms

Resources Loaded

5 sec

Page Rendered

528 ms

portemonnaie.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Portemonnaie content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about portemonnaie.org

Schönes Portemonnaie gesucht? Bei uns finden Sie hochwertige Geldbörsen, Geldbeutel sowie Brieftaschen für ✓ Damen, ✓ Herren und ✓ Kinder im Vergleich.

Visit portemonnaie.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Portemonnaie.org page load time and found that the first response time was 390 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

portemonnaie.org performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,920 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.portemonnaie.org

390 ms

style.min.css

106 ms

style.css

198 ms

better-related.css

205 ms

jquery.min.js

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 144 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (107 requests) were addressed to the original Portemonnaie.org, 7% (10 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (7 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Portemonnaie.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 449.0 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

591.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Portemonnaie.org main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 451.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 142.1 kB

  • Original 182.3 kB
  • After minification 181.4 kB
  • After compression 40.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 53.1 kB

  • Original 406.7 kB
  • After minification 353.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Portemonnaie needs image optimization as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 253.8 kB

  • Original 451.7 kB
  • After minification 451.5 kB
  • After compression 197.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 253.8 kB or 56% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (27%)

Requests Now

142

After Optimization

104

The browser has sent 142 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Portemonnaie. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

portemonnaie.org accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

portemonnaie.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

portemonnaie.org SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Portemonnaie.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Portemonnaie.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Portemonnaie. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: