5.5 sec in total
235 ms
1.7 sec
3.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Privacy Tools content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about privacytools.io
The most reliable website for privacy tools since 2015. Software, services, apps and privacy guides to fight surveillance with encryption for better internet privacy.
Visit privacytools.ioWe analyzed Privacytools.io page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
privacytools.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value820 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.081
94/100
15%
Value17.4 s
4/100
10%
235 ms
266 ms
515 ms
71 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Privacytools.io and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (515 ms) belongs to the original domain Privacytools.io.
Page size can be reduced by 451.9 kB (37%)
1.2 MB
765.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Privacytools.io main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 737.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.1 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Privacy Tools needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 125.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Privacytools.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 135.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (7%)
105
98
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Privacy Tools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
privacytools.io
235 ms
privacytools.io
266 ms
www.privacytools.io
515 ms
bootstrap.min.css
71 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
59 ms
font-awesome.min.css
50 ms
sortable-theme-bootstrap.css
47 ms
custom.css
43 ms
logo.png
34 ms
Glenn-Greenwald-Why-privacy-matters.jpg
46 ms
UKUSA.png
35 ms
USA.png
37 ms
AirVPN.gif
43 ms
AzireVPN.gif
94 ms
blackVPN.gif
46 ms
Cryptostorm.gif
97 ms
FrootVPN.gif
96 ms
hide.me.gif
48 ms
IVPN.gif
95 ms
Mullvad.gif
110 ms
NordVPN.gif
93 ms
Perfect-Privacy.gif
96 ms
Privatoria.gif
98 ms
Proxy.sh.gif
96 ms
warrant-canary.jpg
101 ms
Firefox.png
96 ms
Tor-Browser.png
109 ms
browser-fingerprint.jpg
101 ms
Disconnect.gif
101 ms
uBlock.gif
106 ms
Random-Agent-Spoofer.gif
102 ms
Self-Destructing-Cookies.gif
112 ms
HTTPS-Everywhere.gif
102 ms
Decentraleyes.gif
111 ms
uMatrix.gif
110 ms
NoScript.gif
110 ms
Policeman.gif
116 ms
GhostMail.gif
112 ms
OpenMailBox.gif
102 ms
ProtonMail.ch.gif
171 ms
Tutanota.gif
88 ms
mailbox.org.gif
165 ms
Posteo.gif
89 ms
runbox.gif
86 ms
Neomailbox.gif
167 ms
CounterMail.gif
84 ms
StartMail.gif
81 ms
Kolab-Now.gif
152 ms
CryptoHeaven.gif
318 ms
piwik.js
27 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
28 ms
bootstrap.min.js
200 ms
sortable.min.js
201 ms
Mail-in-a-Box.gif
58 ms
Thunderbird.png
54 ms
Claws-Mail.png
55 ms
Bitmessage.png
59 ms
I2P.png
57 ms
Pond.png
61 ms
DuckDuckGo.jpg
194 ms
Disconnect-Search.jpg
62 ms
Open-Whisper-Systems.png
194 ms
ChatSecure.png
198 ms
Cryptocat.png
201 ms
Linphone.png
198 ms
Jitsi.png
202 ms
Seafile.png
212 ms
ownCloud.jpg
199 ms
S4.jpg
207 ms
Pydio.png
208 ms
Tahoe-LAFS.png
202 ms
SparkleShare.png
203 ms
Syncany.png
206 ms
Syncthing.png
203 ms
Master-Password.jpg
209 ms
KeePass.png
207 ms
Encryptr.png
211 ms
VeraCrypt.png
209 ms
GnuPG.png
209 ms
PeaZip.png
218 ms
GNUnet.png
212 ms
Freenet.png
203 ms
diaspora.png
214 ms
Friendica.png
200 ms
GNU-social.png
175 ms
DNSCrypt.png
171 ms
OpenNIC.png
194 ms
Etherpad.png
170 ms
EtherCalc.png
170 ms
ProtectedText.png
169 ms
Debian.png
169 ms
Trisquel.png
169 ms
Qubes-OS.png
53 ms
Tails.gif
53 ms
KNOPPIX.png
54 ms
Puppy-Linux.png
154 ms
CyanogenMod.png
50 ms
Ubuntu-Touch.png
50 ms
OpenWrt.png
50 ms
pfSense.png
51 ms
LibreWRT.png
48 ms
Windows-10-Privacy.jpg
49 ms
reddit-logo.png
52 ms
creativecommons.png
47 ms
kopimi.gif
47 ms
Bitcoin.png
44 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
27 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
27 ms
privacytools.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
privacytools.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
privacytools.io SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Privacytools.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Privacytools.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
privacytools.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Privacy Tools. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: