5.2 sec in total
1 sec
3.9 sec
234 ms
Visit priveta.ru now to see the best up-to-date Priveta content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about priveta.ru
Visit priveta.ruWe analyzed Priveta.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
priveta.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
90/100
10%
Value1.8 s
99/100
25%
Value3.2 s
91/100
10%
Value1,280 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.209
59/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
1008 ms
301 ms
1210 ms
648 ms
399 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Priveta.ru, 83% (75 requests) were made to Cdneu.wambacdn.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to Top-fwz1.mail.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Cdneu.wambacdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.9 MB (67%)
4.4 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Priveta.ru main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 233.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 43.0 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 233.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Priveta needs image optimization as it can save up to 81.9 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 915.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 915.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Priveta.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (59%)
88
36
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Priveta. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
priveta.ru
1008 ms
Stats.min.js
301 ms
base.css
1210 ms
style.css
648 ms
layers.css
399 ms
ui-userbar.css
408 ms
SearchForm.css
786 ms
slider.css
380 ms
NewFaces.css
541 ms
MainTop.css
572 ms
UserFace2.css
770 ms
style265785805.css
708 ms
lib_versions.js
744 ms
routes.js
731 ms
polyfill.js
800 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
902 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
830 ms
lodash.4.2.1.compat.min.js
860 ms
knockout-3.2.0.js
872 ms
rx.all.compat.js
1112 ms
bowser.js
915 ms
require.js
950 ms
code.js
1057 ms
config.js
984 ms
components.js
1525 ms
web.full.css
1041 ms
icons.css
1310 ms
icons.css
1594 ms
stickers.css
1149 ms
en.js
1191 ms
core.js
1425 ms
moment.js
1310 ms
angular.min.js
1311 ms
angular-resource.min.js
1324 ms
Modal.js
1353 ms
mamba-app.js
1365 ms
paymentMethods.js
1408 ms
advert.js
1145 ms
vipModule.js
1079 ms
photolineModule.js
1106 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
1121 ms
maketopModule.js
987 ms
applicationChargeModule.js
1011 ms
giftModule.js
935 ms
leaderModule.js
1120 ms
1574280881_square.jpg
38 ms
1585588804_square.jpg
36 ms
1591929695_square.jpg
36 ms
1594579291_square.jpg
36 ms
1584120300_square.jpg
37 ms
1595239797_square.jpg
38 ms
icon_menu-new.png
345 ms
l3.gif
90 ms
icon_1.png
96 ms
icon_11.png
94 ms
icon_13.png
86 ms
icon_14.png
89 ms
icon_2.png
343 ms
1.jpg
351 ms
Login.js
309 ms
arrowSearch.sprite.svg
290 ms
photos.png
275 ms
mark-online.png
274 ms
new_faces_reload.jpg
275 ms
icon_reload.png
276 ms
arrows.png
271 ms
circleOnline.small.svg
271 ms
camera.sprite.svg
273 ms
cup.png
259 ms
icons16.png
277 ms
icons13.png
278 ms
base.png
279 ms
registration-sprite.png
279 ms
Registration.js
296 ms
socialButton.png
301 ms
adt.sprite.svg
307 ms
hit
258 ms
AuthStatusMonitor.js
708 ms
init.js
130 ms
code.js
569 ms
velocity.js
93 ms
Select.js
475 ms
Mambarber.js
433 ms
slider-handle.png
88 ms
invisible.sprite.svg
244 ms
noPhoto.sprite.svg
176 ms
init.js
128 ms
counter
142 ms
SynchroMambaTab.js
128 ms
tracker
133 ms
priveta.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
priveta.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
priveta.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Priveta.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Priveta.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
priveta.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Priveta. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: