4.8 sec in total
990 ms
3.5 sec
239 ms
Visit profitap.com now to see the best up-to-date Profitap content for Singapore and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about profitap.com
Profitap develops and manufactures end-to-end visibility solutions for cybersecurity and network performance monitoring applications.
Visit profitap.comWe analyzed Profitap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 990 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
profitap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value18.8 s
0/100
25%
Value17.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,190 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.269
45/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
990 ms
188 ms
281 ms
655 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Profitap.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Profitap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (48%)
3.8 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Profitap.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Profitap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 675.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 675.0 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Profitap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (79%)
84
18
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Profitap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.profitap.com
990 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
188 ms
dashicons.min.css
281 ms
styles.min.css
655 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
470 ms
styles.css
202 ms
style.css
554 ms
frontend.css
302 ms
style.css
832 ms
css
35 ms
style.css
854 ms
shortcodes.css
422 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
534 ms
font-awesome.min.css
16 ms
wpcufpn_front.css
564 ms
css
45 ms
buttons.min.css
644 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
646 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
665 ms
media-views.min.css
756 ms
imgareaselect.css
738 ms
thickbox.css
741 ms
color-picker.min.css
753 ms
global.css
847 ms
input.css
849 ms
style.date_picker.css
862 ms
jquery.js
976 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
921 ms
transition.js
923 ms
dropdown.js
845 ms
collapse.js
856 ms
core.min.js
859 ms
datepicker.min.js
931 ms
input.min.js
935 ms
utils.min.js
940 ms
plupload.full.min.js
956 ms
css
14 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
733 ms
custom.js
823 ms
idle-timer.min.js
824 ms
jquery.form.min.js
823 ms
scripts.js
824 ms
idle-timer.min.js
829 ms
custom.js
851 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
892 ms
waypoints.min.js
781 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
735 ms
custom.js
772 ms
widget.min.js
671 ms
tabs.min.js
698 ms
mouse.min.js
671 ms
sortable.min.js
649 ms
thickbox.js
636 ms
underscore.min.js
661 ms
shortcode.min.js
625 ms
media-upload.min.js
649 ms
backbone.min.js
641 ms
wp-util.min.js
639 ms
wp-backbone.min.js
579 ms
media-models.min.js
570 ms
wp-plupload.min.js
601 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
614 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
623 ms
media-views.min.js
662 ms
media-editor.min.js
592 ms
media-audiovideo.min.js
609 ms
wpcufpn_front.js
625 ms
Profitap-logo-175.png
515 ms
C8R-X1-280px.png
590 ms
MOD-TAP-450px.png
590 ms
F1R-40BD-300px.png
593 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
company.jpg
716 ms
slide-profishark-1g.jpg
796 ms
slide-7.jpg
807 ms
collect
9 ms
collect
78 ms
slide-4.jpg
744 ms
slide-5.jpg
1067 ms
profisharkforairports1.jpg
645 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
30 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
43 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
44 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
43 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
45 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
108 ms
ETmodules_v2.ttf
755 ms
connectedworld.jpg
766 ms
world_map.png
802 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
317 ms
profitap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
profitap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
profitap.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Profitap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Profitap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
profitap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Profitap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: