Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

progress-m.com

Progress Maschinen » plants for precast industry | Progress Maschinen & Automation

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

2.4 sec

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

304 ms

progress-m.com screenshot

About Website

Visit progress-m.com now to see the best up-to-date Progress M content for Ukraine and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about progress-m.com

We have been developing machinery and plants for rebar processing for the past 50 years. tailor-made solutions. plants for precast, rebar and mesh industry.

Visit progress-m.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Progress-m.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

progress-m.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

progress-m.com

2433 ms

system.base.css

227 ms

system.messages.css

232 ms

system.theme.css

260 ms

date.css

242 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Progress-m.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Progress-m.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 630.5 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

732.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Progress-m.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 741.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 42.3 kB

  • Original 51.8 kB
  • After minification 48.9 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 146.8 kB

  • Original 741.8 kB
  • After minification 595.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Progress M needs image optimization as it can save up to 146.8 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 172.5 kB

  • Original 252.0 kB
  • After minification 219.5 kB
  • After compression 79.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 172.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 268.9 kB

  • Original 317.1 kB
  • After minification 227.7 kB
  • After compression 48.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Progress-m.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 268.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (79%)

Requests Now

76

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Progress M. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

progress-m.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

progress-m.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

progress-m.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Progress-m.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Progress-m.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Progress M. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: