1.6 sec in total
114 ms
1.2 sec
303 ms
Visit projectpatch.org now to see the best up-to-date Project Patch content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about projectpatch.org
Restoring HOPE to Teens | Building THRIVING Families | Empowering SUPPORTIVE Communities
Visit projectpatch.orgWe analyzed Projectpatch.org page load time and found that the first response time was 114 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
projectpatch.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.3 s
1/100
10%
Value23.2 s
0/100
25%
Value19.7 s
0/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.098
90/100
15%
Value20.5 s
2/100
10%
114 ms
61 ms
129 ms
115 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Projectpatch.org, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (551 ms) belongs to the original domain Projectpatch.org.
Page size can be reduced by 542.8 kB (15%)
3.6 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Projectpatch.org main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Project Patch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 303.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 303.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Projectpatch.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (53%)
43
20
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Project Patch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
projectpatch.org
114 ms
normalize.css
61 ms
content.min.css
129 ms
responsive.min.css
115 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
96 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
391 ms
modernizr.custom.js
220 ms
util.js
78 ms
cssoverride.css
115 ms
modernizr.custom.js
357 ms
breakpoints.js
232 ms
jquery.meanmenu.min.js
226 ms
canvas.js
226 ms
resp.canvas.js
219 ms
ColorPickerBlock
384 ms
ColorPickerBlock
384 ms
LoginBlock
429 ms
Default.css
383 ms
ContentBlock.css
428 ms
GlobalFormats.css
428 ms
TextBlock
433 ms
TextBlock
434 ms
SlideShowBlock
462 ms
SlideShowBlock
464 ms
css
72 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
23 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
25 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
28 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
27 ms
analytics.js
65 ms
projectpatch.org
58 ms
pattern-white-feathers.png
95 ms
Project%20Patch%20Web.png
240 ms
2595
374 ms
2434
306 ms
2480
282 ms
2436
343 ms
2437
322 ms
2429
339 ms
2253
332 ms
2433
374 ms
circle-twitter.png
320 ms
circle-youtube.png
324 ms
circle-facebook.png
551 ms
slide_control_hover.png
357 ms
slide_control.png
345 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xJhsE6jcpsD2oq89kgohWx0.ttf
21 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xD1GzwQ5qF9DNzkQQVRhJ4g.ttf
21 ms
collect
8 ms
collect
52 ms
projectpatch.org accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
projectpatch.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
projectpatch.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Projectpatch.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Projectpatch.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
projectpatch.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Project Patch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: