3.7 sec in total
180 ms
3.1 sec
410 ms
Visit qanalysts.com now to see the best up-to-date Q Analysts content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qanalysts.com
The world’s top tech companies trust us to deliver quality assurance testing and ground truth data services for artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Visit qanalysts.comWe analyzed Qanalysts.com page load time and found that the first response time was 180 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
qanalysts.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value13.8 s
0/100
25%
Value24.1 s
0/100
10%
Value19,230 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.023
100/100
15%
Value26.7 s
0/100
10%
180 ms
1292 ms
223 ms
223 ms
284 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Qanalysts.com, 26% (19 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Qanalysts.com.
Page size can be reduced by 504.5 kB (69%)
726.2 kB
221.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Qanalysts.com main page is 726.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 246.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 174.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Q Analysts images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 144.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.7 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 184.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qanalysts.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 184.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (82%)
50
9
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Q Analysts. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
qanalysts.com
180 ms
qanalysts.com
1292 ms
color-picker.min.css
223 ms
styles.css
223 ms
font-awesome.min.css
284 ms
style.css
221 ms
front.min.css
138 ms
font-awesome.css
232 ms
style.css
229 ms
jquery.min.js
295 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
209 ms
js
53 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
154 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
155 ms
core.min.js
220 ms
mouse.min.js
226 ms
draggable.min.js
227 ms
slider.min.js
391 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
392 ms
iris.min.js
394 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
394 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
393 ms
index.js
393 ms
tf_numbers.min.js
395 ms
scripts.min.js
619 ms
smoothscroll.js
438 ms
hashchange.js
438 ms
front.min.js
438 ms
common.js
438 ms
api.js
60 ms
index.js
436 ms
wp-embed.min.js
536 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
761 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
535 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
536 ms
fbevents.js
189 ms
Q-Analysts-Small-logo.png
251 ms
preloader.gif
331 ms
Logos_ISO-27001-Logo-FINAL-Transparent.png
331 ms
js
79 ms
analytics.js
131 ms
QdVUSTchPBm7nuUeVf7Eug.woff
131 ms
QdVUSTchPBm7nuUeVf7EuQ.ttf
210 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XXMI.woff
222 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XXME.ttf
294 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXXMI.woff
292 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXXME.ttf
291 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ArQXMI.woff
291 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ArQXME.ttf
294 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQXMI.woff
293 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQXME.ttf
297 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQXMI.woff
294 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQXME.ttf
291 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_LjQXMI.woff
294 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_LjQXME.ttf
296 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjRXMI.woff
293 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjRXME.ttf
290 ms
modules.ttf
291 ms
256286342425836
162 ms
et-divi-dynamic-193-late.css
141 ms
collect
118 ms
collect
161 ms
recaptcha__en.js
190 ms
style.min.css
277 ms
anchor
78 ms
styles__ltr.css
9 ms
recaptcha__en.js
12 ms
webworker.js
269 ms
logo_48.png
173 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
8 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
9 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
8 ms
qanalysts.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
qanalysts.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
qanalysts.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qanalysts.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qanalysts.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qanalysts.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Q Analysts. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: