5.1 sec in total
294 ms
4.4 sec
405 ms
Visit qg.com now to see the best up-to-date Qg content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qg.com
We're Quad, a marketing solutions company. We help your marketing machine run more smoothly, saving you time, money and resources while giving you better results, speed and efficiency. Learn more...
Visit qg.comWe analyzed Qg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
qg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value23.4 s
0/100
25%
Value15.1 s
1/100
10%
Value4,720 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value24.4 s
0/100
10%
294 ms
62 ms
101 ms
141 ms
178 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Qg.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (656 ms) belongs to the original domain Qg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 640.8 kB (29%)
2.2 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Qg.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 42.9 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 444.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 444.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (65%)
79
28
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.qg.com
294 ms
VisitorIdentification.js
62 ms
slick
101 ms
fancybox
141 ms
main
178 ms
modernizr
143 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
423 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.24.js
541 ms
jquery.validate.js
153 ms
jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js
170 ms
sc.fields-unobtrusive.js
170 ms
sc.fields-events-tracking.js
478 ms
sc.fields-date.js
478 ms
sc.fields-captcha.js
479 ms
sc.ajax-form.js
479 ms
wffm-form-fields.css
504 ms
Default.css
482 ms
Custom.css
483 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
490 ms
in.js
82 ms
jquery
460 ms
slick
459 ms
SliderAlt
458 ms
fancybox
460 ms
main
461 ms
SocialLinks
482 ms
analytics.js
210 ms
jquery.ui.base.css
134 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
130 ms
Solutions_for_Business.jpg
124 ms
CapOverTopImage_613x385-r3.jpg
236 ms
Varying-Industry-Professionals.jpg
276 ms
About-Us-Joel.jpg
241 ms
Career-Opportunities.jpg
656 ms
Rodale-Hero.jpg
266 ms
GG-Hero.jpg
290 ms
Copy%20of%201-4-R-Lama-Rotating-Images_Approved-Supplier.jpg
369 ms
Postal-Education-Whats-New.jpg
365 ms
The-Quad-Difference.jpg
320 ms
Careers.jpg
413 ms
Investors.jpg
414 ms
collect
14 ms
logo.png
239 ms
Joels-Office.jpg
379 ms
button--scroll-down.png
283 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
285 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.css
312 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.css
315 ms
jquery.ui.button.css
328 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker.css
356 ms
jquery.ui.dialog.css
342 ms
jquery.ui.progressbar.css
345 ms
jquery.ui.resizable.css
356 ms
jquery.ui.selectable.css
370 ms
jquery.ui.slider.css
372 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.css
385 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
534 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
532 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
533 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
533 ms
icomoon.woff
591 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
147 ms
sdk.js
418 ms
platform.js
114 ms
widgets.js
114 ms
ajax-loader.gif
78 ms
share
167 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
155 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
33 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
32 ms
fastbutton
120 ms
button.b059c0eb61ea902a882e5c5b3c66a17a.js
10 ms
postmessageRelay
147 ms
tweet_button.baa54ded21a982344c4ced326592f3de.en.html
86 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
86 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
86 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
248 ms
api.js
40 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
208 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
172 ms
jot
142 ms
155 ms
xd_arbiter.php
301 ms
share_button.php
131 ms
zH0IPw-UmpL.js
303 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
458 ms
qg.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
qg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
qg.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: