1 sec in total
80 ms
843 ms
90 ms
Welcome to qsalvage.com homepage info - get ready to check Qsalvage best content right away, or after learning these important things about qsalvage.com
Visit qsalvage.comWe analyzed Qsalvage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 80 ms and then it took 933 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
qsalvage.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value6.8 s
35/100
10%
Value920 ms
31/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.4 s
7/100
10%
80 ms
108 ms
160 ms
101 ms
246 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Qsalvage.com, 49% (22 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 24% (11 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (362 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 337.7 kB (46%)
727.3 kB
389.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Qsalvage.com main page is 727.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 429.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 334.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 334.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 766 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qsalvage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (43%)
23
13
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qsalvage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.qsalvage.com
80 ms
minified.js
108 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
160 ms
polyfill.min.js
101 ms
thunderbolt-commons.2113c4aa.bundle.min.js
246 ms
main.6c492079.bundle.min.js
247 ms
lodash.min.js
246 ms
react.production.min.js
138 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
245 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
247 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
247 ms
526119_03df7bb8bc704296bdd99add0d3e4cbe~mv2.jpg
305 ms
bundle.min.js
210 ms
qsilogo.png
362 ms
Gavel.png
291 ms
11062b_32805ea2b36c4e0baa7475391c9c58cd~mv2.jpeg
315 ms
086c5d22c3f24976b166c7c601fbdafe.jpg
240 ms
QSI%20Logo%20NEW-Full%20Border.png
289 ms
526119_2af52fd7c61e44559dd74dd4d86b2655f001.jpg
344 ms
qsilogo.png
330 ms
03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff
37 ms
80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff
38 ms
61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff
38 ms
AvenirLTW05-85Heavy.woff
38 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
46 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
37 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
47 ms
144 ms
142 ms
147 ms
146 ms
140 ms
158 ms
185 ms
180 ms
175 ms
178 ms
176 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
39 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
9 ms
right-arrow.svg
27 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
7 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
11 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
10 ms
qsalvage.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
qsalvage.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
qsalvage.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qsalvage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Qsalvage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qsalvage.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qsalvage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: