Tools & Wizards About Us
quackling.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

quackling.com

Quackling Ducks

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

475 ms

Resources Loaded

884 ms

Page Rendered

202 ms

quackling.com screenshot

About Website

Visit quackling.com now to see the best up-to-date Quackling content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about quackling.com

All about ducks - real and not so real. Duck games and stuff for fun.

Visit quackling.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Quackling.com page load time and found that the first response time was 475 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

quackling.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value680 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

quackling.com

475 ms

script.js

50 ms

style.css

80 ms

postratings-css.css

56 ms

site.css

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Quackling.com, 2% (1 request) were made to I44.tinypic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Clh.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (475 ms) belongs to the original domain Quackling.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 177.2 kB (37%)

Content Size

482.8 kB

After Optimization

305.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Quackling.com main page is 482.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 300.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 15.2 kB

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 20.2 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 49.8 kB

  • Original 300.4 kB
  • After minification 250.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Quackling needs image optimization as it can save up to 49.8 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 85.4 kB

  • Original 129.9 kB
  • After minification 128.4 kB
  • After compression 44.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 26.8 kB

  • Original 31.3 kB
  • After minification 22.8 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Quackling.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (55%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Quackling. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

quackling.com

quackling.com

475 ms

script.js

script.js

50 ms

style.css

style.css

80 ms

postratings-css.css

postratings-css.css

56 ms

site.css

site.css

58 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

134 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

60 ms

jscripts.php

jscripts.php

105 ms

postratings-js.js

postratings-js.js

77 ms

site_fadeOut.js

site_fadeOut.js

77 ms

jscripts-ftr-min.js

jscripts-ftr-min.js

78 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

28 ms

e0si86.jpg

e0si86.jpg

260 ms

charles140x188.jpg

charles140x188.jpg

63 ms

ducks_walking_cr.jpg

ducks_walking_cr.jpg

240 ms

Page-BgTexture.jpg

Page-BgTexture.jpg

35 ms

Page-BgGradient.jpg

Page-BgGradient.jpg

29 ms

Page-BgGlare.png

Page-BgGlare.png

108 ms

Sheet-s.png

Sheet-s.png

29 ms

Sheet-h.png

Sheet-h.png

31 ms

Sheet-v.png

Sheet-v.png

32 ms

Sheet-c.png

Sheet-c.png

56 ms

Header.jpg

Header.jpg

82 ms

item-left.png

item-left.png

57 ms

item-right.png

item-right.png

58 ms

item-center.png

item-center.png

60 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

82 ms

subitem-bg.png

subitem-bg.png

83 ms

nav.png

nav.png

84 ms

Block-s.png

Block-s.png

85 ms

Block-h.png

Block-h.png

107 ms

Block-v.png

Block-v.png

107 ms

Block-c.png

Block-c.png

109 ms

Button.png

Button.png

110 ms

BlockHeaderIcon.png

BlockHeaderIcon.png

110 ms

BlockContentBullets.png

BlockContentBullets.png

130 ms

rssIcon.png

rssIcon.png

133 ms

Footer.png

Footer.png

133 ms

rating_over.gif

rating_over.gif

134 ms

stripe-black.png

stripe-black.png

163 ms

border-black.png

border-black.png

161 ms

Accessibility Review

quackling.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

quackling.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

quackling.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Quackling.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Quackling.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

quackling.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Quackling. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: