1.6 sec in total
92 ms
1.3 sec
201 ms
Visit qualitycoatingsinc.com now to see the best up-to-date Qualitycoatingsinc content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qualitycoatingsinc.com
Visit qualitycoatingsinc.comWe analyzed Qualitycoatingsinc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
qualitycoatingsinc.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
Value1.0 s
100/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value6,520 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
92 ms
57 ms
84 ms
41 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Qualitycoatingsinc.com, 46% (33 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 22% (16 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Frog.wix.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (74%)
3.2 MB
831.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Qualitycoatingsinc.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 675 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qualitycoatingsinc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 246.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qualitycoatingsinc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 246.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (68%)
63
20
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qualitycoatingsinc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
qualitycoatingsinc.com
92 ms
www.qualitycoatingsinc.com
57 ms
bt
84 ms
require.min.js
41 ms
main-r.min.js
47 ms
viewer.css
60 ms
dynamicmodel
26 ms
62efd9_84ede35dea7284065df6f39241f991a0_1.json.z
41 ms
62efd9_72de68631c66a894f0695e256c5706ea_1.json.z
48 ms
ugc-viewer
80 ms
bt
83 ms
skins.min.js
168 ms
components.min.js
75 ms
utils.min.js
76 ms
core.min.js
74 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
52 ms
lodash.min.js
39 ms
TweenMax.min.js
158 ms
layout.min.js
74 ms
tpa.min.js
73 ms
fonts.min.js
72 ms
animations.min.js
74 ms
swfobject.min.js
156 ms
mousetrap.min.js
156 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
158 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
157 ms
react-dom.min.js
155 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
156 ms
widgets.min.js
156 ms
experiment.js
155 ms
render.min.js
155 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
157 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
156 ms
zepto.min.js
155 ms
color.min.js
154 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
66 ms
bt
118 ms
bt
222 ms
latin.css
213 ms
dc.js
220 ms
84770f_f2e08c1ae4fb5a1d24933a57f5e012d8.png
137 ms
a5f759_60ff229c4871497cbf58b6a8fe1ac1cf.jpg
46 ms
a5f759_65b0df13e3244042acadc1f2cde890a4.jpg
46 ms
a5f759_a84d21d8bc8f4f92a7b8cba234971514.jpg
61 ms
a5f759_2192f1e6dcef4a3bbb1b5dd7c18a50b9.jpg
74 ms
a5f759_4da5e6d9394d4d92a73ea333be3de7a6.jpg
73 ms
a5f759_dfbb319029f542ab8a2db8f9579b6cd1.jpg
83 ms
a5f759_f3bacfe8022b4c15bec3365b275789c6.jpg
89 ms
a5f759_f7f4febcc3b14ed7ac8a8d4f137b436b.jpg
161 ms
7355b116f509973815da125ab3ce4065.wix_mp
75 ms
89b1d2497b29ccbb7d37be1ec6ef0052.png
81 ms
7dc1a51ce9ab33209fee14899955a67f.wix_mp
82 ms
a5f759_d4b15355391c489b8fac043a7577ed98.jpg
82 ms
bt
45 ms
bt
44 ms
bt
44 ms
shiny1button_bg.png
57 ms
HZjQrx4sm8s
134 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
20323430-24f4-4767-9d4d-060d1e89758a.woff
25 ms
ae844b11-5158-4caf-90b4-7ace49ac3440.woff
26 ms
d3bbaa1b-d5e3-431f-93a7-9cea63601bb6.woff
45 ms
ga-audiences
52 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
56 ms
www-embed-player.js
87 ms
base.js
143 ms
a5f759_d4b15355391c489b8fac043a7577ed98.jpg
110 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
8 ms
ad_status.js
37 ms
ugc-viewer
35 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
31 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
qualitycoatingsinc.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
qualitycoatingsinc.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
qualitycoatingsinc.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualitycoatingsinc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Qualitycoatingsinc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qualitycoatingsinc.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qualitycoatingsinc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: