3.6 sec in total
470 ms
2.7 sec
432 ms
Welcome to qualityretouching.com homepage info - get ready to check Qualityretouching best content for Greece right away, or after learning these important things about qualityretouching.com
Visit qualityretouching.comWe analyzed Qualityretouching.com page load time and found that the first response time was 470 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
qualityretouching.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value910 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value13.2 s
12/100
10%
470 ms
70 ms
84 ms
84 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (106 requests) were addressed to the original Qualityretouching.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Qualityretouching.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (18%)
8.1 MB
6.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Qualityretouching.com main page is 8.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 107.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qualityretouching images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 229.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qualityretouching.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 229.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (55%)
112
50
The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qualityretouching. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
qualityretouching.com
470 ms
style.css
70 ms
jquery.nouislider.css
84 ms
ImageComparisonSlider.css
84 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.css
151 ms
jquery-ui-spinner.css
148 ms
calendar-jos.css
64 ms
form_maker_frontend.css
72 ms
html5reset.css
73 ms
style.css
254 ms
skin.css
91 ms
highslide.css
190 ms
shortcodes.css
130 ms
wp.css
162 ms
media.css
217 ms
home.css
199 ms
jetpack.css
246 ms
jquery.min.js
61 ms
core.min.js
194 ms
widget.min.js
219 ms
mouse.min.js
219 ms
draggable.min.js
276 ms
jquery.beforeafter-1.3.instruite.min.js
250 ms
jquery.nouislider.js
278 ms
ImageComparisonSlider.js
271 ms
js
72 ms
if_gmap_front_end.js
277 ms
jelly.min.js
337 ms
file-upload.js
292 ms
calendar.js
343 ms
calendar_function.js
292 ms
cufon-yui.js
304 ms
DejaVu_Serif_Condensed_700.font.js
706 ms
cufon-colors.js
308 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
310 ms
highslide-full.js
395 ms
highslide.config.js
351 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
27 ms
e-201611.js
26 ms
raphael-min.js
424 ms
slider.js
347 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
346 ms
z.trans.en.js
321 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
344 ms
jquery.wipetouch.js
361 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
361 ms
scripts.js
375 ms
shortcodes.js
310 ms
custom.js
332 ms
slider.min.js
317 ms
button.min.js
311 ms
spinner.min.js
328 ms
effect.min.js
302 ms
effect-shake.min.js
301 ms
wp-embed.min.js
297 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
319 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
25-textile-white.png
169 ms
aside_wedget_t.png
172 ms
aside_wedget.png
168 ms
logo-186x40.png
170 ms
mm_spread.png
168 ms
aside_wedget_b.png
170 ms
top_bg.png
172 ms
32_o.jpg
501 ms
X8A4835argi22.jpg
503 ms
DSC5305b.jpg
618 ms
DSC_4572a.jpg
475 ms
IMG_1633ed.jpg
492 ms
YCM9375e1.jpg
576 ms
StudioFive-1197b.jpg
635 ms
IMG_6774b1.jpg
677 ms
MG_4388c1.jpg
700 ms
DSC2405B.jpg
1022 ms
MG_1031aa.jpg
762 ms
bac1_hd.jpg
1041 ms
15960.jpg
844 ms
bg2.png
741 ms
desc-bg.png
738 ms
home-bg.png
819 ms
slide-bg.png
820 ms
resize.php
896 ms
li-mask.png
856 ms
resize.php
917 ms
resize.php
933 ms
resize.php
976 ms
resize.php
1109 ms
resize.php
998 ms
resize.php
1108 ms
resize.php
1186 ms
resize.php
1172 ms
resize.php
1190 ms
resize.php
1125 ms
resize.php
1079 ms
resize.php
1179 ms
marker.png
1031 ms
bottom_bg.png
1040 ms
google+.png
1055 ms
facebook.png
1057 ms
collect
13 ms
g.gif
5 ms
twitter.png
1027 ms
linkedin.png
763 ms
behance.png
865 ms
prev.png
869 ms
playd.png
864 ms
next.png
794 ms
stop.png
744 ms
select.png
740 ms
custom.png
102 ms
zoomout.cur
31 ms
ajax-loader.gif
32 ms
custom-body.png
102 ms
qualityretouching.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
qualityretouching.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
qualityretouching.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qualityretouching.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Qualityretouching.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
qualityretouching.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qualityretouching. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: