Tools & Wizards About Us
qumed.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

qumed.org

DropCatch.com

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

224 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

354 ms

qumed.org screenshot

About Website

Visit qumed.org now to see the best up-to-date Qumed content for Saudi Arabia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about qumed.org

DropCatch.com helps you secure expiring domain names.

Visit qumed.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Qumed.org page load time and found that the first response time was 224 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

qumed.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

eng

224 ms

674 ms

grid-responsive.css

33 ms

bootstrap.css

78 ms

master-801aea5cc6234c6c3f76187ff8fa92cf.css

91 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Qumed.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Lh5.ggpht.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Lh4.ggpht.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (674 ms) relates to the external source Med.qu.edu.sa.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 712.7 kB (46%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

820.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Qumed.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 634.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 97.7 kB

  • Original 107.3 kB
  • After minification 56.1 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 51.2 kB, which is 48% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.7 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 634.8 kB
  • After minification 606.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Qumed images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 356.8 kB

  • Original 512.6 kB
  • After minification 501.8 kB
  • After compression 155.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 356.8 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 229.5 kB

  • Original 278.8 kB
  • After minification 271.3 kB
  • After compression 49.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Qumed.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 229.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (62%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Qumed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eng

eng

224 ms

674 ms

grid-responsive.css

grid-responsive.css

33 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

78 ms

master-801aea5cc6234c6c3f76187ff8fa92cf.css

master-801aea5cc6234c6c3f76187ff8fa92cf.css

91 ms

master-webkit.css

master-webkit.css

34 ms

rtl-801aea5cc6234c6c3f76187ff8fa92cf.css

rtl-801aea5cc6234c6c3f76187ff8fa92cf.css

36 ms

demo-801aea5cc6234c6c3f76187ff8fa92cf.css

demo-801aea5cc6234c6c3f76187ff8fa92cf.css

88 ms

mediaqueries.css

mediaqueries.css

63 ms

menu-dropdown-direction.css

menu-dropdown-direction.css

65 ms

menu.css

menu.css

101 ms

slideshow2.css

slideshow2.css

99 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

150 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

112 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

112 ms

caption.js

caption.js

124 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

171 ms

core.js

core.js

141 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

219 ms

rt-parallax.js

rt-parallax.js

148 ms

chart.js

chart.js

168 ms

gantry-totop.js

gantry-totop.js

187 ms

browser-engines.js

browser-engines.js

188 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

187 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

198 ms

sidemenu.js

sidemenu.js

199 ms

mootools-mobile.js

mootools-mobile.js

199 ms

rokmediaqueries.js

rokmediaqueries.js

206 ms

roksprocket.js

roksprocket.js

208 ms

moofx.js

moofx.js

267 ms

features.js

features.js

266 ms

slideshow2.js

slideshow2.js

265 ms

2007.jpg

2007.jpg

130 ms

Elearning%20in%20COM_Page_01.jpg

Elearning%20in%20COM_Page_01.jpg

126 ms

staff_guide.png

staff_guide.png

126 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

49 ms

logo2.png

logo2.png

24 ms

hani_shobeily.jpg

hani_shobeily.jpg

73 ms

community.jpg

community.jpg

84 ms

PT.jpg

PT.jpg

71 ms

simec.jpg

simec.jpg

65 ms

elearn.jpg

elearn.jpg

81 ms

grads.jpg

grads.jpg

140 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

92 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

99 ms

studentguide.png

studentguide.png

22 ms

journal.png

journal.png

20 ms

lato-regular-webfont.woff

lato-regular-webfont.woff

115 ms

lato-bold-webfont.woff

lato-bold-webfont.woff

137 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

181 ms

SEO Factors

qumed.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Qumed.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Qumed.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

qumed.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Qumed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: