3.7 sec in total
208 ms
3 sec
493 ms
Click here to check amazing 2015 Revision Party content for Belgium. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 2015.revision-party.net
Revision 2015 is a demoparty in southwest Germany. It takes place from April 3rd to 6th 2015 in the E Werk in Saarbruecken, Germany. Lots of competitions and events as well as international socializin...
Visit 2015.revision-party.netWe analyzed 2015.revision-party.net page load time and found that the first response time was 208 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
2015.revision-party.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value5.5 s
54/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.049
99/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
208 ms
549 ms
33 ms
97 ms
193 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original 2015.revision-party.net, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain 2015.revision-party.net.
Page size can be reduced by 408.4 kB (13%)
3.2 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of 2015.revision-party.net main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2015 Revision Party images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 134.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.1 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 157.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2015.revision-party.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 157.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (25%)
48
36
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2015 Revision Party. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
2015.revision-party.net
208 ms
2015.revision-party.net
549 ms
bootstrap.min.css
33 ms
5b93aa62c9cf3c1b5c88093bd248b403.css
97 ms
45932c198fccdbff0f43edc424c30d18.css
193 ms
56a95c38d9045b6929eab900e336981d.css
279 ms
44d04efdbec1cae905a1d3e5c3b7dcde.css
286 ms
a234be23e7022037dd037f0e11be138b.css
290 ms
e35b40d64650f1036f3669410d6ddbdf.css
516 ms
a5621cd635e21230842458026d28e7a0.css
370 ms
1d02373b17d5efd82f8b86d16aa637c9.js
577 ms
bootstrap.min.js
40 ms
js
40 ms
css
56 ms
css
68 ms
ga.js
118 ms
bg.jpg
594 ms
island.png
1075 ms
island-debris.png
685 ms
cloud-level1.png
611 ms
cloud-level2.png
1335 ms
rocket-smoke.png
1552 ms
rocket-engine.png
1171 ms
rocket.png
996 ms
minirocket.png
792 ms
revision-logo.png
903 ms
revision-logo-small.png
1006 ms
x172_y100_5a1d03_02.png
1092 ms
x100_y100_f8c7f8_02.png
1099 ms
x100_y100_7e6d0e_02.png
1169 ms
x172_y100_f1d573_02.png
1187 ms
x100_y100_413331_03.png
1193 ms
x114_y100_ec8df0_03.png
1265 ms
x100_y100_24fdb3_04.png
1263 ms
x172_y100_ad5474_03.png
1282 ms
x100_y100_8f1f27_04.png
1285 ms
x200_y100_3ebd98_03.png
1356 ms
x114_y100_f178f2_03.png
1361 ms
x100_y100_07e440_04.png
1376 ms
x125_y100_51e0c9_02.png
1378 ms
x103_y100_a46144_02.png
1428 ms
x100_y100_a9f700_02.png
1450 ms
x130_y100_ab9e4d_02.png
1457 ms
x125_y100_1a8a06_02.png
1473 ms
x100_y100_a5082a_02.png
1471 ms
x113_y100_0e8d2c_02.png
1523 ms
x158_y100_6a27c5_03.png
1543 ms
x134_y100_9982c1_03.png
1551 ms
x228_y100_07650f_03.png
1565 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
99 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcsBaWKZ57bY3RXgXH6dOjZ0.ttf
107 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37ZiwlidHJgAgmTjOEEzwu1L8.ttf
116 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJTdGNerWpg2Hn6A-BxWgZ_I.ttf
129 ms
helium.woff
1672 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
2015.revision-party.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
2015.revision-party.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
2015.revision-party.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2015.revision-party.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2015.revision-party.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
2015.revision-party.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 2015 Revision Party. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: