Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

discussions.readersstuffz.com

readersstuffz.com - readersstuffz Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

14.2 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

12.5 sec

Page Rendered

386 ms

discussions.readersstuffz.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Discussions Readersstuffz content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about discussions.readersstuffz.com

readersstuffz.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, readersstuffz.com has it all. We hope ...

Visit discussions.readersstuffz.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Discussions.readersstuffz.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 12.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

discussions.readersstuffz.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

discussions.readersstuffz.com

1330 ms

external.php

70 ms

jquery.js

126 ms

jquery-ui.js

103 ms

index.css

102 ms

Our browser made a total of 226 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (174 requests) were addressed to the original Discussions.readersstuffz.com, 3% (7 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com and 2% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Discussions.readersstuffz.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (55%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Discussions.readersstuffz.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 282.6 kB

  • Original 325.5 kB
  • After minification 316.2 kB
  • After compression 42.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 282.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 114.7 kB

  • Original 580.0 kB
  • After minification 465.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Discussions Readersstuffz needs image optimization as it can save up to 114.7 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 722.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 467.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 722.9 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 127.6 kB

  • Original 162.3 kB
  • After minification 125.2 kB
  • After compression 34.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Discussions.readersstuffz.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 127.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (32%)

Requests Now

222

After Optimization

152

The browser has sent 222 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Discussions Readersstuffz. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

discussions.readersstuffz.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Discussions.readersstuffz.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Discussions.readersstuffz.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Discussions Readersstuffz. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: