7.5 sec in total
769 ms
6.3 sec
484 ms
Click here to check amazing Eef Rtu content for Latvia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eef.rtu.lv
RTU Datorzinātnes, informācijas tehnoloģijas un enerģētikas fakultātes mājaslapa. Studijas, Zinātne, Ziņas, Notikumi, Kontakti
Visit eef.rtu.lvWe analyzed Eef.rtu.lv page load time and found that the first response time was 769 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
eef.rtu.lv performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value1,370 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.062
97/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
769 ms
604 ms
130 ms
1272 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eef.rtu.lv, 95% (92 requests) were made to Rtu.lv and 2% (2 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Rtu.lv.
Page size can be reduced by 294.5 kB (14%)
2.1 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Eef.rtu.lv main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eef Rtu images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 163.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eef.rtu.lv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 163.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (23%)
91
70
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eef Rtu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eef.rtu.lv
769 ms
604 ms
130 ms
evif
1272 ms
js
86 ms
tcal_lv_dots.js
219 ms
js_config
555 ms
parsed_css_fd41b9cbf9ae83be7199a01588238c1f.css
488 ms
parsed_js_cb6cbf500c7d69a8a6eea710afee0e06.js
678 ms
select2_locale_lv.js
365 ms
common.css
372 ms
eef.css
395 ms
privatedaddy.js
483 ms
postscribe.min.js
489 ms
unibit-cookies-enabler.js
506 ms
unibit-cookies-enabler.css
600 ms
gen_204
43 ms
darken_light.png
315 ms
go_to_top.png
314 ms
darken.png
137 ms
logo_lv.png
138 ms
arrow_down.png
310 ms
dropdown_arrow.png
139 ms
search2.png
313 ms
b_RTU_2_1.jpg
559 ms
b_RTU_6_2.jpg
563 ms
b_RTU_3_5.jpg
768 ms
arrow_left.png
314 ms
arrow_right.png
315 ms
go_down.png
367 ms
h_line.png
505 ms
s_RTU_nell_uzaicinajums2.jpg
507 ms
calendar_3x.png
505 ms
play.png
518 ms
s_RTU_bif_udens_tehnologiju_laboratorija_1_.jpg
606 ms
s_RTU_cow_gcd40f5527_1920.jpg
632 ms
m_RTU_img_20201218_133550.jpg
755 ms
m_RTU_edited_dsc1219.jpg
675 ms
m_RTU_1_rtu_dalba_izstd_skola_2020_49604228992_o.jpg
680 ms
m_RTU_7_1.jpg
722 ms
m_RTU_2_dsc_0050.jpg
867 ms
m_RTU_img_6060.jpg
794 ms
m_RTU_dsc_1133.jpg
797 ms
m_RTU_img_9356.jpg
841 ms
bg_pattern.png
881 ms
phone_icon.png
887 ms
rss.png
911 ms
fb.png
918 ms
li.png
960 ms
tw.png
994 ms
yt.png
1008 ms
tt.png
1005 ms
fl.png
939 ms
mp-regular.otf
913 ms
mp-bold.otf
954 ms
in.png
823 ms
rtu.png
839 ms
ortus.png
858 ms
ranked_2021.png
863 ms
qs_stars_2019.png
896 ms
the_wur_2021.png
933 ms
multirank.png
910 ms
green_metric.png
781 ms
eduniversal_new.png
790 ms
impact.png
819 ms
modal_bg.png
833 ms
logo_lv.svg
815 ms
go_to_top.svg
845 ms
arrow_down.svg
800 ms
dropdown_arrow.svg
778 ms
search2.svg
772 ms
arrow_left.svg
797 ms
arrow_right.svg
766 ms
go_down.svg
781 ms
calendar_3x.svg
766 ms
play.svg
746 ms
phone_icon.svg
768 ms
rss.svg
762 ms
fb.svg
741 ms
li.svg
771 ms
tw.svg
779 ms
yt.svg
750 ms
tt.svg
767 ms
fl.svg
771 ms
in.svg
734 ms
rtu.svg
767 ms
ortus.svg
779 ms
ranked_2021.svg
766 ms
qs_stars_2019.svg
754 ms
the_wur_2021.svg
757 ms
multirank.svg
732 ms
green_metric.svg
747 ms
eduniversal_new.svg
745 ms
impact.svg
756 ms
botchat.min.css
454 ms
botchat.min.js
696 ms
mail_icon.svg
129 ms
eef.rtu.lv accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
eef.rtu.lv best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eef.rtu.lv SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
LV
LV
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eef.rtu.lv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Latvian/Lettish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eef.rtu.lv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eef.rtu.lv
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eef Rtu. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: