Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

74 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

213 ms

image.rock.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to image.rock.com homepage info - get ready to check Image Rock best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about image.rock.com

rock.com music products

Visit image.rock.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Image.rock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 74 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

image.rock.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

image.rock.com

74 ms

www.rock.com

90 ms

default-retail.css

16 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.7.custom.css

11 ms

jquery-all.js

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 115 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Image.rock.com, 37% (42 requests) were made to Rock.com and 10% (12 requests) were made to Rock.brandretailers.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (878 ms) relates to the external source Rock.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.1 MB (79%)

Content Size

10.3 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Image.rock.com main page is 10.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 56.4 kB

  • Original 70.9 kB
  • After minification 61.9 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 6.7 MB

  • Original 8.5 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Image Rock needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.7 MB or 79% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 907.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 363.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 907.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 372.5 kB

  • Original 445.1 kB
  • After minification 405.1 kB
  • After compression 72.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Image.rock.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 372.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (50%)

Requests Now

106

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Image Rock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

image.rock.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Image.rock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Image.rock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Image Rock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: