Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

journal.ruobr.ru

Школьные маршруты

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

188 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

171 ms

journal.ruobr.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Journal Ruobr content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about journal.ruobr.ru

Visit journal.ruobr.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Journal.ruobr.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 188 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

journal.ruobr.ru performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.4 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

188 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css

515 ms

jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.css

339 ms

select2.css

516 ms

paginator3000.css

347 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Journal.ruobr.ru and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Journal.ruobr.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 511.4 kB (58%)

Content Size

888.0 kB

After Optimization

376.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Journal.ruobr.ru main page is 888.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 557.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 663 B, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 695 B

  • Original 239.9 kB
  • After minification 239.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Journal Ruobr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 433.6 kB

  • Original 557.5 kB
  • After minification 445.2 kB
  • After compression 123.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 433.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 74.5 kB

  • Original 86.7 kB
  • After minification 67.8 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Journal.ruobr.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (71%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Journal Ruobr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

journal.ruobr.ru accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

journal.ruobr.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

journal.ruobr.ru SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Journal.ruobr.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Journal.ruobr.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Journal Ruobr. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: