4 sec in total
933 ms
2.8 sec
267 ms
Visit radfordtransit.com now to see the best up-to-date Radfordtransit content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about radfordtransit.com
Passio Transit Systems
Visit radfordtransit.comWe analyzed Radfordtransit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 933 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
radfordtransit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value300 ms
79/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
933 ms
187 ms
249 ms
140 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Radfordtransit.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (933 ms) belongs to the original domain Radfordtransit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 632.2 kB (36%)
1.7 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Radfordtransit.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 839.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Radfordtransit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 196.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 196.2 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 375.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radfordtransit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 375.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (67%)
61
20
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radfordtransit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.radfordtransit.com
933 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
187 ms
dashicons.min.css
249 ms
wunderground.css
140 ms
css
25 ms
fonts.css
249 ms
normalize.css
139 ms
foundation.css
414 ms
styles.css
188 ms
style.css
189 ms
style.css
307 ms
style.css
250 ms
default.min.css
251 ms
genericons.css
308 ms
jetpack.css
370 ms
jquery-2.2.1.min.js
499 ms
core.min.js
312 ms
widget.min.js
367 ms
position.min.js
368 ms
menu.min.js
374 ms
autocomplete.min.js
429 ms
widget.min.js
429 ms
modernizr.js
430 ms
jquery-migrate-1.3.0.min.js
433 ms
element.js
35 ms
flexslider.css
374 ms
public.css
395 ms
wpstarter-functions.js
393 ms
foundation.min.js
542 ms
wpforge-functions.js
445 ms
ditty-news-ticker-images.js
446 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
7 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
457 ms
load-foundation.js
456 ms
wp-embed.min.js
455 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
593 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
radford-transit1.png
63 ms
trip-planner-2.jpg
364 ms
trip-planner-3.jpg
434 ms
trip-planner.jpg
364 ms
nt_cloudy.gif
148 ms
wundergroundLogo_4c_horz.png
150 ms
new-monthly-pass-tickets.png
243 ms
radford-trasnit-next-bus-300x126.jpg
244 ms
translateelement.css
58 ms
main.js
135 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
22 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
38 ms
Genericons.svg
212 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
30 ms
Genericons.svg
208 ms
VerbLight-webfont.woff
208 ms
VerbRegular-webfont.woff
209 ms
element_main.js
64 ms
hovercard.css
82 ms
services.css
83 ms
translate_24dp.png
37 ms
l
41 ms
g.gif
27 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
29 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
111 ms
googlelogo_color_68x28dp.png
3 ms
cleardot.gif
36 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
20 ms
loading.gif
26 ms
radfordtransit.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
radfordtransit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
radfordtransit.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radfordtransit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Radfordtransit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
radfordtransit.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Radfordtransit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: