1.6 sec in total
97 ms
812 ms
648 ms
Welcome to radview.com homepage info - get ready to check Radview best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about radview.com
The most flexible and cost effective performance testing software solution for enterprise load, performance, and stress testing. See why.
Visit radview.comWe analyzed Radview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 97 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
radview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.3 s
0/100
10%
Value24.1 s
0/100
25%
Value17.3 s
0/100
10%
Value3,200 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.328
35/100
15%
Value24.4 s
0/100
10%
97 ms
49 ms
49 ms
42 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Radview.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Static.olark.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (374 ms) belongs to the original domain Radview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 511.3 kB (30%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Radview.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 988.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Radview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 262.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 197.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Radview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 197.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (46%)
57
31
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
radview.com
97 ms
www.radview.com
49 ms
default.include.abc578.css
49 ms
font-awesome.min.css
42 ms
language-selector.css
29 ms
sitepress.js
16 ms
conversion.js
18 ms
default.include-footer.7d897c.js
105 ms
j.php
43 ms
ga.js
51 ms
page.js
28 ms
loader0.js
256 ms
262 ms
logo.png
246 ms
nav-arrow-down.png
244 ms
us.png
242 ms
fr.png
242 ms
de.png
241 ms
pt-br.png
242 ms
radview_hero.jpg
341 ms
software1.jpg
374 ms
round1.png
260 ms
wire1.png
258 ms
dot.png
257 ms
round2.png
269 ms
wire6.png
268 ms
block1.png
268 ms
wire2.png
268 ms
block2.png
290 ms
wire_3.png
290 ms
dashboard.jpg
364 ms
wire8.png
289 ms
wire9.png
323 ms
wire4-1.png
323 ms
quote1m.png
322 ms
quote2m.png
335 ms
ebay.jpg
322 ms
bswift.png
334 ms
liquidity-services.png
337 ms
performance-testing-case-study-ebay.png
359 ms
client1.png
360 ms
client2.png
359 ms
client3.png
358 ms
client4.png
365 ms
client5.png
366 ms
client6.png
364 ms
client7.png
365 ms
client8.png
369 ms
v.gif
211 ms
count.js
122 ms
__utm.gif
116 ms
client9.png
161 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
167 ms
os_400.woff
165 ms
os_700.woff
189 ms
os_300.woff
147 ms
client10.png
165 ms
3503-495-10-8018.js
42 ms
367-x-221-WebLOAD-vs.-LoadRunner-295-178-1-100-c4bcc0cbae22acaeafdbceb1401efa6b.png
174 ms
83 ms
367-x-221-WebLOAD-Key-Features-295-178-1-100-e0ca863b4154a0c069fd18d7089db212.png
149 ms
367-x-221Load-Testing-Mistakes-295-178-1-100-f2d49c7589be26bef454a42af83cbfae.png
170 ms
c
147 ms
collect
81 ms
application2.js
105 ms
radview.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
radview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
radview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Radview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
radview.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Radview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: