Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

982 ms in total

First Response

126 ms

Resources Loaded

496 ms

Page Rendered

360 ms

rangefinderalternative.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rangefinderalternative content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rangefinderalternative.com

File Upload widget with multiple file selection, drag&drop support, progress bar and preview images for jQuery. Supports cross-domain, chunked and resumable file uploads. Works with any server-side pl...

Visit rangefinderalternative.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rangefinderalternative.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 856 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rangefinderalternative.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

rangefinderalternative.com

126 ms

www.rangefinderalternative.com

144 ms

main.css

5 ms

css

73 ms

prototype.js

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Rangefinderalternative.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (144 ms) belongs to the original domain Rangefinderalternative.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 181.8 kB (25%)

Content Size

735.0 kB

After Optimization

553.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Rangefinderalternative.com main page is 735.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 522.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 11.2 kB
  • After minification 10.1 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 522.0 kB
  • After minification 498.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rangefinderalternative images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 138.9 kB

  • Original 187.7 kB
  • After minification 144.2 kB
  • After compression 48.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 14.2 kB
  • After minification 11.4 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rangefinderalternative.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rangefinderalternative. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

SEO Factors

rangefinderalternative.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rangefinderalternative.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rangefinderalternative.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rangefinderalternative. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: