5.8 sec in total
449 ms
4.8 sec
541 ms
Click here to check amazing Rare Hq content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rarehq.com
Build a sustainable company with purposeful, engaging, and results-driven strategies from specialist brand consultants. Contact us today.
Visit rarehq.comWe analyzed Rarehq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 449 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
rarehq.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value10.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value1,840 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value16.4 s
5/100
10%
449 ms
1074 ms
214 ms
427 ms
618 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Rarehq.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Static.mailerlite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Rarehq.com.
Page size can be reduced by 212.1 kB (25%)
859.2 kB
647.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rarehq.com main page is 859.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 514.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 164.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 21.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rarehq.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.8 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (79%)
77
16
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rare Hq. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rarehq.com
449 ms
rarehq.com
1074 ms
styles.css
214 ms
mailerlite_forms.css
427 ms
style.css
618 ms
font-awesome-legacy.min.css
685 ms
grid-system.css
689 ms
style.css
897 ms
header-secondary-nav.css
691 ms
element-post-grid.css
699 ms
element-horizontal-list-item.css
826 ms
element-wpb-column-border.css
893 ms
element-recent-posts.css
904 ms
css
40 ms
masonry-core.css
906 ms
masonry-classic-enhanced.css
910 ms
responsive.css
1033 ms
flickity.css
1104 ms
skin-material.css
1106 ms
menu-dynamic.css
1109 ms
js_composer.min.css
1120 ms
salient-dynamic-styles.css
1125 ms
css
38 ms
jquery.min.js
1453 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1315 ms
js
76 ms
webforms.min.js
51 ms
style-non-critical.css
1318 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
1316 ms
core.css
1334 ms
slide-out-right-material.css
1334 ms
index.js
1612 ms
index.js
1612 ms
salient-social.js
1613 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
1614 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
1613 ms
priority.js
1660 ms
transit.min.js
1774 ms
waypoints.js
1774 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
1774 ms
hoverintent.min.js
1856 ms
api.js
104 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1855 ms
anime.min.js
1671 ms
flickity.min.js
1665 ms
vivus.min.js
1475 ms
superfish.js
1404 ms
init.js
1563 ms
touchswipe.min.js
1402 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1411 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1421 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1354 ms
index.js
1346 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1345 ms
nectar-delay-javascript.js
1468 ms
gtm.js
151 ms
universal.js
150 ms
u8c3f8
252 ms
rare-black.webp
986 ms
rare-white.webp
984 ms
visioning-new-saudi-arabia-3-900x604.webp
1155 ms
cycle-west-1-900x604.webp
1372 ms
frictionless-payment-1-900x604.webp
1170 ms
remuera-heritage-1-900x604.webp
1235 ms
article-culturally-relevant-brand-500x807.webp
1557 ms
leveraging-brand-metrics-500x807.webp
1368 ms
article-mastering-brand-arch-500x807.webp
1564 ms
fonts.css
192 ms
kaia.webp
1322 ms
article-embracing-purpose.webp
1386 ms
article-brand-arch-maze.webp
1726 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
js
148 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
86 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
117 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
147 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
146 ms
icomoon.woff
1425 ms
universal.css
17 ms
collect
62 ms
css
173 ms
s9j0h2y3m9_popups.js
207 ms
ml_jQuery.inputmask.bundle.min.js
144 ms
recaptcha__en.js
148 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
137 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
9 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
88 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
41 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
259 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
89 ms
rarehq.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rarehq.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rarehq.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rarehq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rarehq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rarehq.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rare Hq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: