2.6 sec in total
297 ms
2 sec
293 ms
Welcome to raspberrywebserver.com homepage info - get ready to check Raspberryweb SERVER best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about raspberrywebserver.com
WISH4D game slot77 terpercaya dengan provider slot88 mudah jackpot gampang maxwin deposit via qris wish 4d.
Visit raspberrywebserver.comWe analyzed Raspberrywebserver.com page load time and found that the first response time was 297 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
raspberrywebserver.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value6.7 s
7/100
25%
Value9.7 s
11/100
10%
Value4,850 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.3 s
2/100
10%
297 ms
10 ms
6 ms
407 ms
191 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Raspberrywebserver.com, 11% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (541 ms) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 493.9 kB (57%)
866.9 kB
373.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Raspberrywebserver.com main page is 866.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 651.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Raspberryweb SERVER images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 439.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 439.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (60%)
57
23
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Raspberryweb SERVER. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
raspberrywebserver.com
297 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
quant.js
6 ms
ckeditor.js
407 ms
cookiechoices.js
191 ms
adsbygoogle.js
22 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
313 ms
lightbox.min.js
205 ms
pixel;r=2022746367;a=p-6SdC8CyKkpXyY;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1547840654-1456825949070;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456825949070;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fraspberrywebserver.com%2F;ogl=
17 ms
collect
12 ms
spreddit7.gif
21 ms
tumblr_mlvme52NlI1so209ao1_500.jpg
53 ms
tumblr_inline_ml40xmylr81qz4rgp.jpg
24 ms
Twitter.png
102 ms
Facebook.png
101 ms
Google.png
101 ms
rss32x32.png
159 ms
widgets.js
17 ms
platform.js
81 ms
ca-pub-3334370317978895.js
70 ms
zrt_lookup.html
125 ms
show_ads_impl.js
69 ms
all.js
304 ms
count.js
112 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
98 ms
loading.gif
144 ms
close.png
144 ms
ads
194 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
49 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
79 ms
fastbutton
127 ms
osd.js
41 ms
ads
235 ms
ads
315 ms
count-data.js
81 ms
tweet_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en-gb.html
46 ms
postmessageRelay
79 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
18 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
80 ms
m_js_controller.js
65 ms
abg.js
86 ms
api.js
47 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
127 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
73 ms
220 ms
xd_arbiter.php
248 ms
xd_arbiter.php
452 ms
favicon
124 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
123 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
102 ms
jot
195 ms
5856156373647012822
102 ms
s
88 ms
x_button_blue2.png
67 ms
4253454884475785818
29 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
10 ms
ui
37 ms
like.php
55 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
479 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
541 ms
raspberrywebserver.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
raspberrywebserver.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
raspberrywebserver.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Raspberrywebserver.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Raspberrywebserver.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
raspberrywebserver.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Raspberryweb SERVER. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: