4.6 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.2 sec
197 ms
Visit ratestar.in now to see the best up-to-date Ratestar content for Singapore and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ratestar.in
Visit ratestar.inWe analyzed Ratestar.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Ratestar.in rating and web reputation
ratestar.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value5.0 s
26/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.076
95/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
1247 ms
1524 ms
772 ms
958 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Ratestar.in, 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ratestar.in.
Page size can be reduced by 950.7 kB (70%)
1.4 MB
408.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ratestar.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 955.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 500 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ratestar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 804.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 804.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 139.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ratestar.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 139.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (82%)
28
5
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ratestar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ratestar.in
1247 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1524 ms
styles.css
772 ms
font-awesome.css
958 ms
css
27 ms
css
36 ms
WebResource.axd
768 ms
WebResource.axd
566 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1166 ms
ScriptResource.axd
768 ms
ScriptResource.axd
783 ms
ScriptResource.axd
782 ms
ScriptResource.axd
984 ms
ScriptResource.axd
991 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1000 ms
ScriptResource.axd
988 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1174 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1183 ms
ScriptResource.axd
1188 ms
WebResource.axd
1190 ms
jquery.js
1555 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1220 ms
modernizr.js
1379 ms
appear.js
1221 ms
jquery.ccountdown.js
1221 ms
analytics.js
55 ms
bg7.png
768 ms
Rate-Star-Logo.png
231 ms
collect
16 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
5 ms
fontawesome-webfontba72.woff
190 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
10 ms
fontawesome-webfontba72.ttf
393 ms
ratestar.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ratestar.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ratestar.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ratestar.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ratestar.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ratestar.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ratestar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: