5.9 sec in total
229 ms
4.3 sec
1.4 sec
Visit razorfrog.com now to see the best up-to-date Razorfrog content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about razorfrog.com
WordPress Web Design & Development for San Francisco Bay Area Small Businesses. Responsive Websites, E-Commerce, Logos, Copywriting & More. Get A Quote!
Visit razorfrog.comWe analyzed Razorfrog.com page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
razorfrog.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value9.5 s
1/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value1,240 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
229 ms
270 ms
413 ms
470 ms
449 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Razorfrog.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Razorfrog.com.
Page size can be reduced by 256.6 kB (12%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Razorfrog.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 177.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 177.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 76.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Razorfrog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Razorfrog.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (49%)
74
38
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Razorfrog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
razorfrog.com
229 ms
razorfrog.com
270 ms
style.min.css
413 ms
styles-blocks.css
470 ms
style-frontend.php
449 ms
swipebox.min.css
432 ms
testimonials.css
396 ms
style.css
529 ms
bootstrap.min.css
756 ms
style.css
856 ms
formsmain.min.css
814 ms
gravity-mod.css
743 ms
the-grid.min.css
746 ms
jquery.min.js
584 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
584 ms
jquery.cookie.js
585 ms
ct-front.js
585 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
597 ms
underscore.min.js
608 ms
infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js
622 ms
front.js
639 ms
modernizr.js
655 ms
js
150 ms
js_composer.min.css
1275 ms
script.js
784 ms
cookiebanner.js
778 ms
cookiebanner-init.js
779 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
811 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
810 ms
testimonials.js
811 ms
webfont.js
812 ms
isotope.js
803 ms
plugins.js
1077 ms
main.js
785 ms
frogs.js
1057 ms
effect.min.js
1060 ms
the-grid.min.js
1062 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1060 ms
razorfrog-logo-turquoise-trademark-standard.png
374 ms
razorfrog-logo-turquoise-trademark-retina.png
372 ms
razorfrog-logo-white-trademark-standard.png
371 ms
razorfrog-logo-white-trademark-retina.png
198 ms
sf-embarcadero-aerial-gradient-blurred-warm-v2.jpg
603 ms
razorfrog-geometric-turquoise.jpg
604 ms
healthforce-superfoods-logo-black.png
479 ms
astra-client-logo.png
746 ms
proterra-logo.png
604 ms
radical-candor-logo-web.png
746 ms
cellarmaker.png
907 ms
guss-community-market-logo-web.png
834 ms
nomad-logo.png
905 ms
ben-davis-720x540.png
969 ms
de-young-reflections-web.jpg
1118 ms
responsive-displays-reference-turquoise.png
1089 ms
fm-industries-imac-640x480.jpg
1211 ms
harambe-2022-ipad-640x480.jpg
1299 ms
scalechain-iphone-640x480.jpg
1338 ms
sloan-sakai-macbook-pro-640x480.jpg
1394 ms
sf-lombard-street-top-down-view.jpg
1593 ms
razorfrog-vintage-logo-turquoise-retina.png
1590 ms
fleming-jones-photo-2-uai-720x720.jpg
1640 ms
robbie-lazarow-headshot.jpg
1683 ms
Logan-Allin.jpeg
1635 ms
gretchen-smail-alsop-louie-partners.jpg
1729 ms
amanda-monchamp.jpg
1949 ms
Barry-Canty-Tie-Jacket-For-Twitter.jpg
2112 ms
about-us.jpg
2214 ms
lisa-ligon-aeropress-inc.jpg
2006 ms
kelly.jpg
2050 ms
abstract-bokeh-lights.jpg
2184 ms
js
160 ms
analytics.js
153 ms
montserrat-v24-latin-regular.woff
2146 ms
montserrat-v24-latin-700.woff
2195 ms
Icons.svg
2314 ms
collect
125 ms
prev.png
1838 ms
next.png
1894 ms
the_grid.ttf
1707 ms
razorfrog.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
razorfrog.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
razorfrog.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Razorfrog.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Razorfrog.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
razorfrog.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Razorfrog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: