2.8 sec in total
321 ms
2.1 sec
328 ms
Click here to check amazing Razor Sync content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about razorsync.com
RazorSync is the top rated field service software. Utilize our features to work smarter, not harder. Learn more about who we are today!
Visit razorsync.comWe analyzed Razorsync.com page load time and found that the first response time was 321 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
razorsync.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value9.5 s
0/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value7,100 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.348
32/100
15%
Value29.5 s
0/100
10%
321 ms
75 ms
144 ms
146 ms
148 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Razorsync.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Simplify.razorsync.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (601 ms) belongs to the original domain Razorsync.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (58%)
2.5 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Razorsync.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 448.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Razor Sync needs image optimization as it can save up to 448.1 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 813.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 813.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Razorsync.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (54%)
81
37
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Razor Sync. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.razorsync.com
321 ms
html5reset.css
75 ms
columns.css
144 ms
carousel.css
146 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
148 ms
AddCalEvent.css
152 ms
jquery-ui.css
167 ms
css
38 ms
css
51 ms
style.css
185 ms
shiftnav.min.css
214 ms
font-awesome.min.css
216 ms
standard-dark.css
221 ms
jquery.js
305 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
247 ms
carousel.js
261 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
286 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
287 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js
45 ms
jquery-ui.js
520 ms
jquery.h5validate.js
328 ms
conversion.js
33 ms
AddCalEventZones.js
349 ms
AddCalEvent.js
355 ms
navigation.js
353 ms
shiftnav.min.js
374 ms
responsivegridsystem.js
406 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
254 ms
j.php
11 ms
evergage.min.js
124 ms
gtm.js
119 ms
16658
221 ms
logo.png
119 ms
97dcd2cfc92f401ba164879d1e6c94be.jpg
216 ms
feature-bg-flat.jpg
161 ms
feature-cta-flat.png
162 ms
demo-device.jpg
116 ms
apple-reviews.jpg
114 ms
android-reviews.jpg
114 ms
feature-devices-video.png
160 ms
bg-customerMgmt.jpg
233 ms
bg-invoiceMgmt.jpg
247 ms
bg-fieldworkerMgmt.jpg
259 ms
bg-scheduleMgmt.jpg
229 ms
apple-download.jpg
228 ms
android-download.jpg
228 ms
Home-Office-Computer-Services-logo.jpg
301 ms
Overhead-Door-logo.jpg
369 ms
Bartlett-Comm-logo.jpg
370 ms
MidSouth-logo.jpg
376 ms
Air-of-Excellence-Logo.jpg
417 ms
Bobs-Logo.jpg
430 ms
Webb-Logo.jpg
374 ms
Kortman-Logo.jpg
511 ms
Marks-Plumbing-Service-Logo.jpg
516 ms
Matley-Logo.jpg
447 ms
Park-Place-Installation-Logo.jpg
452 ms
Serenity-Hardscapes-Logo.jpg
500 ms
Stinson-Logo.jpg
601 ms
Bugs-B-Gone-Logo.jpg
522 ms
logo-white.png
528 ms
footer-facebook.jpg
583 ms
footer-twitter.jpg
582 ms
footer-linkedin.jpg
584 ms
insight.min.js
77 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
43 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
43 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
42 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
42 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
482 ms
v.gif
40 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
conversion_async.js
31 ms
fbds.js
32 ms
bat.js
32 ms
hotjar-99768.js
130 ms
twreceiver
36 ms
collect
10 ms
collect
67 ms
146 ms
bg-body.jpg
546 ms
16658
152 ms
78 ms
modules-1f5c71aea63f8df71401422ed80fbe5f.js
53 ms
visit-data
217 ms
23 ms
18 ms
razorsync.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
razorsync.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
razorsync.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Razorsync.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Razorsync.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
razorsync.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Razor Sync. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: