2.6 sec in total
500 ms
1.9 sec
154 ms
Visit rdif.ru now to see the best up-to-date Rdif content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rdif.ru
УК РФПИ, фонд прямых инвестиций РФ, фонд прямых инвестиций Кирилл Александрович Дмитриев (Kirill Dmitriev) :: Российский фонд прямых инвестиций
Visit rdif.ruWe analyzed Rdif.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 500 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rdif.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value6.1 s
44/100
10%
Value730 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
500 ms
283 ms
556 ms
39 ms
138 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Rdif.ru, 12% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (783 ms) belongs to the original domain Rdif.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 340.9 kB (57%)
601.6 kB
260.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Rdif.ru main page is 601.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 380.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rdif images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 252.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 252.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rdif.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 85% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
21
21
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rdif. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
rdif.ru
500 ms
style.css
283 ms
require-jquery.js
556 ms
css
39 ms
logo.gif
138 ms
i-home.png
139 ms
search.png
271 ms
slider-img1_2.jpg
537 ms
arrow.png
272 ms
image_photo____image___image001.jpg_188_100.jpg
281 ms
arrows_1.png
275 ms
img_why-russia_2.jpg
410 ms
arrow-small.png
404 ms
flag_saudi.gif
405 ms
Logo-lenta-ru.jpg
412 ms
qr3.gif
413 ms
soc.png
538 ms
captcha.php
541 ms
site.js
783 ms
ga.js
12 ms
watch.js
8 ms
yrzXiAvgeQQdopyG8QSg8Q.woff
41 ms
g46X4VH_KHOWAAa-HpnGPhsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
42 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
rdif.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rdif.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rdif.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rdif.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rdif.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rdif.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rdif. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: