4.9 sec in total
1.2 sec
3.5 sec
141 ms
Click here to check amazing Reaching Light content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reachinglight.com
Our goal is to promote action against efforts to restrict spiritual freedom and provide information about the benefits of alternative spirituality.
Visit reachinglight.comWe analyzed Reachinglight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
reachinglight.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.069
96/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
1241 ms
473 ms
321 ms
330 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Reachinglight.com, 15% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Reachinglight.com.
Page size can be reduced by 362.1 kB (67%)
542.3 kB
180.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Reachinglight.com main page is 542.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 369.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Reaching Light needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 248.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 248.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reachinglight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (74%)
39
10
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reaching Light. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.reachinglight.com
1241 ms
style.css
473 ms
foundation-responsive.css
321 ms
style-custom.css
330 ms
css
27 ms
css
39 ms
css
48 ms
layerslider.css
473 ms
addtoany.min.css
332 ms
superfish.css
332 ms
fancybox.css
327 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
474 ms
flexslider.css
478 ms
jquery.js
998 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
531 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
842 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
669 ms
jquerytransit.js
669 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
824 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
692 ms
comment-reply.min.js
830 ms
superfish.js
824 ms
supersub.js
852 ms
hoverIntent.js
979 ms
jquery.easing.js
980 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
984 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
1099 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
1100 ms
gdl-scripts.js
1139 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1449 ms
ga.js
43 ms
facebook.png
164 ms
twitter.png
165 ms
RL_logo1.png
182 ms
stunning-text-pattern.png
166 ms
UK_Esoteric_Filter_Infographic_thumb2-400x300.jpg
398 ms
search-button.png
325 ms
li-arrow.png
325 ms
page.js
32 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
23 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
23 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
23 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nnl4twXkwp3_u9ZoePkT564.woff
22 ms
cj2hUnSRBhwmSPr9kS5899kZXW4sYc4BjuAIFc1SXII.woff
23 ms
c92rD_x0V1LslSFt3-QEpgRV2F9RPTaqyJ4QibDfkzM.woff
19 ms
QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwTqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
19 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
reachinglight.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
reachinglight.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
reachinglight.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reachinglight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reachinglight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reachinglight.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reaching Light. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: