2.6 sec in total
137 ms
2 sec
379 ms
Visit reachmail.net now to see the best up-to-date Reachmail content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about reachmail.net
{{description}}
Visit reachmail.netWe analyzed Reachmail.net page load time and found that the first response time was 137 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
reachmail.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.1 s
0/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value13.5 s
2/100
10%
Value17,620 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.103
89/100
15%
Value28.5 s
0/100
10%
137 ms
161 ms
49 ms
98 ms
150 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Reachmail.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Reachmail.net.
Page size can be reduced by 358.2 kB (51%)
701.5 kB
343.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Reachmail.net main page is 701.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 260.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reachmail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 156.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 156.6 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 170.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reachmail.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 170.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (49%)
78
40
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reachmail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
reachmail.net
137 ms
www.reachmail.net
161 ms
flexslider.min.css
49 ms
style.min.css
98 ms
bootstrap.min.css
150 ms
font-awesome.min.css
107 ms
social.min.css
208 ms
style_orange.min.css
1219 ms
css
22 ms
common.js
98 ms
jquery.js
207 ms
modernizr.custom.28468.js
145 ms
bootstrap-transition.js
159 ms
bootstrap-alert.min.js
191 ms
bootstrap-dropdown.min.js
195 ms
bootstrap-scrollspy.min.js
201 ms
bootstrap-tab.min.js
237 ms
bootstrap-tooltip.min.js
243 ms
bootstrap-popover.min.js
252 ms
bootstrap-button.min.js
249 ms
bootstrap-collapse.min.js
252 ms
bootstrap-carousel.min.js
281 ms
bootstrap-typeahead.min.js
288 ms
bootstrap-affix.min.js
297 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
296 ms
superfish.js
296 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
326 ms
custom.js
330 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
346 ms
jquery.mousewheel.js
342 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
345 ms
jquery.cslider.js
371 ms
conversion.js
19 ms
91 ms
home-slider-bgd.png
147 ms
searchbutton.png
78 ms
logo.png
79 ms
transparent.png
77 ms
icon-envelope-home.png
77 ms
icon-arrow-home.png
79 ms
icon-money-bags.png
138 ms
video-placeholder.png
185 ms
tour_01.png
142 ms
webinar_02.png
143 ms
service_01.png
136 ms
signup_01.png
178 ms
footer-winged-email.png
183 ms
enevelope.gif
188 ms
leah.jpg
180 ms
vistavu_logo.jpg
189 ms
jason.jpg
228 ms
groceryGame.jpg
239 ms
shervin.jpg
226 ms
ReliaQuote.jpg
229 ms
robin.jpg
236 ms
quartz-events-logo.jpg
232 ms
pete.jpg
273 ms
smslogo.jpg
274 ms
harold.jpg
281 ms
createyourcruiselogo.jpg
278 ms
jerry.jpg
287 ms
hilife1_image.jpg
284 ms
rbr.jpg
320 ms
immunoChem.jpg
323 ms
printMedLogo.jpg
325 ms
reachmail-dude.png
336 ms
footer-logo-bbb.png
338 ms
footer-logo-return-path.png
331 ms
footer-logo-email-experience-council.png
369 ms
analytics.js
45 ms
59 ms
Safe-Harbor-Certification-Mark.png
303 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
347 ms
facebook.png
309 ms
twitter2.png
309 ms
phone.png
313 ms
email.png
344 ms
47 ms
collect
27 ms
53 ms
37 ms
totop.png
296 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
49 ms
reachmail.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
reachmail.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
reachmail.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reachmail.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reachmail.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
reachmail.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Reachmail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: