Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

readersread.com

Readers Read

Page Load Speed

16.2 sec in total

First Response

3.5 sec

Resources Loaded

12.2 sec

Page Rendered

415 ms

readersread.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to readersread.com homepage info - get ready to check Readers Read best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about readersread.com

Readers Read - coverage of books and literature including reviews, features, hot books and more!

Visit readersread.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Readersread.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.5 sec and then it took 12.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

readersread.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,280 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.3 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

readersread.com

3528 ms

www.readersread.com

1666 ms

5749 ms

rrmode.css

23 ms

brand

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Readersread.com, 32% (19 requests) were made to Writerswrite.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.7 sec) relates to the external source Writerswrite.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 362.3 kB (52%)

Content Size

696.0 kB

After Optimization

333.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Readersread.com main page is 696.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 450.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 98.5 kB

  • Original 133.5 kB
  • After minification 133.3 kB
  • After compression 35.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.5 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 103.0 kB
  • After minification 94.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Readers Read images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 247.6 kB

  • Original 450.7 kB
  • After minification 450.6 kB
  • After compression 203.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 247.6 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Readersread.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (49%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Readers Read. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

readersread.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

readersread.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

readersread.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Readersread.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Readersread.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Readers Read. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: