2.2 sec in total
13 ms
1.5 sec
720 ms
Click here to check amazing Realview Service content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about realviewservice.com
Visit realviewservice.comWe analyzed Realviewservice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
realviewservice.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value15.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
13 ms
252 ms
23 ms
25 ms
113 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (88 requests) were addressed to the original Realviewservice.com, 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (678 ms) relates to the external source Livewp.site.
Page size can be reduced by 270.9 kB (10%)
2.7 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Realviewservice.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 208.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 208.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Realview Service images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (64%)
90
32
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Realview Service. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
realviewservice.com
13 ms
realviewservice.com
252 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
23 ms
realviewservice.com
25 ms
column.css
113 ms
gt3-core-counter.css
128 ms
gt3-core-button.css
106 ms
slick.css
103 ms
gt3-core-portfoliocarousel.css
114 ms
gt3-core-piechart.css
105 ms
style.min.css
131 ms
classic-themes.min.css
107 ms
styles.css
136 ms
animations.css
180 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
137 ms
frontend.min.css
248 ms
swiper.min.css
145 ms
post-7.css
203 ms
global.css
147 ms
post-37.css
226 ms
style.css
230 ms
theme_icon.css
230 ms
font-awesome.min.css
198 ms
theme.css
325 ms
base-elementor.css
339 ms
photo_modules.css
356 ms
responsive.css
291 ms
css
45 ms
jquery.min.js
247 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
269 ms
select2.full.min.js
388 ms
css
55 ms
animations.min.css
285 ms
rs6.css
376 ms
core.js
375 ms
column.js
433 ms
index.js
344 ms
index.js
374 ms
rbtools.min.js
650 ms
api.js
55 ms
rs6.min.js
652 ms
jquery.cookie.js
606 ms
theme.js
457 ms
css
14 ms
jquery.event.swipe.js
521 ms
gt3-core-counter.js
520 ms
gt3-core-button.js
560 ms
slick.js
628 ms
gt3-core-portfoliocarousel.js
634 ms
gt3-core-piechart.js
632 ms
circle-progress.min.js
611 ms
comment-reply.min.js
600 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
598 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
599 ms
waypoints.min.js
591 ms
core.min.js
590 ms
swiper.min.js
560 ms
share-link.min.js
537 ms
dialog.min.js
536 ms
frontend.min.js
510 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
558 ms
core-frontend.js
559 ms
icon_11.png
636 ms
icon_12.png
678 ms
Artboard-1-1.png
328 ms
Artboard-1-copy-3.png
329 ms
dummy.png
329 ms
Screenshot-2021-02-25-115822.jpg
330 ms
Screenshot-2021-02-25-115944.jpg
329 ms
Screenshot-2021-02-25-115426.jpg
331 ms
Screenshot-2021-02-25-115631.jpg
333 ms
Screenshot-2021-02-25-120108.jpg
333 ms
Screenshot-2021-02-25-120214.jpg
332 ms
woman.jpg
332 ms
men-cleaning.jpg
374 ms
uphold.jpg
377 ms
floor.jpg
345 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
39 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
175 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf
217 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf
219 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf
221 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
220 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
220 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
221 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf
284 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
342 ms
3.jpg
314 ms
19.jpg
173 ms
1.jpg
132 ms
9.jpg
128 ms
dsa.jpg
129 ms
sad.jpg
130 ms
fea.jpg
130 ms
recaptcha__en.js
92 ms
df.jpg
63 ms
fs.jpg
63 ms
13.jpg
63 ms
works.jpg
63 ms
02.jpg
64 ms
home_bg_2.png
63 ms
select2.min.css
28 ms
Flaticon.svg
79 ms
Flaticon.woff
120 ms
realviewservice.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
realviewservice.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
realviewservice.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Realviewservice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Realviewservice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
realviewservice.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Realview Service. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: