Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 72

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

recoverydatabase.net

Recovery Database Network

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

242 ms

Resources Loaded

928 ms

Page Rendered

177 ms

recoverydatabase.net screenshot

About Website

Visit recoverydatabase.net now to see the best up-to-date Recovery Database content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about recoverydatabase.net

RDN Marketing Website

Visit recoverydatabase.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Recoverydatabase.net page load time and found that the first response time was 242 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

recoverydatabase.net performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.188

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.recoverydatabase.net

242 ms

rdn_v02.css

183 ms

jquery.min.js

66 ms

jquery.scrollTo-min.js

206 ms

loadv2.js

208 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Recoverydatabase.net, 10% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (388 ms) belongs to the original domain Recoverydatabase.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.9 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

996.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Recoverydatabase.net main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 7.4 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 39.9 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 974.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Recovery Database images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 20.7 kB
  • After minification 20.0 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 5.7 kB
  • After minification 4.5 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Recoverydatabase.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (20%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Recovery Database. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

recoverydatabase.net accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

recoverydatabase.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

recoverydatabase.net SEO score

72

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Recoverydatabase.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Recoverydatabase.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Recovery Database. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: